On 07-May-14, at 5:47 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> To my mind, editing relations in both directions on a form is no
> different to being able to query in both directions in a filter
> statement.
I agree. Being able to create forms from multiple models would be
killer. No application of us
On 5/17/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing holding me back from full support is the name; "values"
> doesn't explain enough about what the app does to me. Yes, it's
> bike-shedding, but Django's always had a nice color scheme. That is,
> names are important (to a po
Cool.
I attached a simple patch that shows how I ended up solving the "size"
problem. I just realized there's a small bug in my cut & paste but
you can get the idea.
size_cache.set(self.filename, im.size, _SIZE_CACHE_TIMEOUT)
should be
size_cache.set(self.filename, img.size, _SIZE_CACHE_TI
Right, check out the ticket again - new patch up.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4115
On May 17, 1:19 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The most common use case is that someone wants to create the tag
> with the appropriate height and width. If the incorrect values are
On 5/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Right now, it looks like I'll end up creating a thumbnails directory
> in /django/tests/regressiontests. Is this the right locattion?
The general rule of thumb is: if you're testing a feature of the ORM
-- a field, a database method, a
On 5/15/07, jedie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats about INTERNAL_IPS [1] ?
I think you need to let this one go. Malcom's already given a -1 and
no other developers stepped up with even a +0.
I'd love to see you develop this as an add-on -- a piece of exception
middleware, probably -- but I do
> In my opinion it really deserves a spot in the default contrib apps.
Mine as well.
The only thing holding me back from full support is the name; "values"
doesn't explain enough about what the app does to me. Yes, it's
bike-shedding, but Django's always had a nice color scheme. That is,
names
On 5/17/07, Robert Coup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I just wonder whether for files/images its worth having a python
> object that provides the methods, since there is other metadata besides
> the python file object (like its name!)
>
> eg:
> my_model.attachment.file <- python file object
>
Marty Alchin wrote:
> I like that approach to this rather tricky situation. With all my
> recent work on DurationField, I took a chance at trying to make your
> code into something generic enough to work for both needs, and
> possibly others. I'm imagining a FileField that can act as a file-type
>
Thanks Jacob. Sorry about that. I will post to the users group instead.
Cheers.
On 5/17/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/17/07, dtlaura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have a great opportunity for python/django developers. Please check
> > out our job posting and appl
On 5/17/07, dtlaura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have a great opportunity for python/django developers. Please check
> out our job posting and apply online if you are interested.
Hey --
Thanks for the job posting -- hope you find a good person! -- but in
the future please limit these types of
Hi Everyone,
We have a great opportunity for python/django developers. Please check
out our job posting and apply online if you are interested.
Cheers.
Click on
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/web/dt-is-looking-to-hire-a-bright-django-developer
- or copy & paste it into your b
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:22 +, nagi wrote:
> Thats unique_together = ('Field1','Field2') Thanks for the
> suggestion..
In future, please ask these sorts of questions on the django-users list.
We try very hard to keep internal development and user support on their
respective lists, for the
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:52 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
> I dont understand that changes. For me thats just odd, and
> a royal pain to update lots of sites just for renaming clean_data to
> cleaned_data.
It's good programming practice that when a backwards incompatible change
is introduce
I like that approach to this rather tricky situation. With all my
recent work on DurationField, I took a chance at trying to make your
code into something generic enough to work for both needs, and
possibly others. I'm imagining a FileField that can act as a file-type
object, lazily opening the fi
I dont understand that changes. For me thats just odd, and
a royal pain to update lots of sites just for renaming clean_data to
cleaned_data.
I really think thats odd and a better rationale would take in consideration
that already working and defined functions should try to keep at least some k
Done. :)
On 5/17/07, Robert Coup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi powerful-ones,
>
> Any chance of getting a Trac component created for the
> django.contrib.gis stuff?
>
> Cheers
>
> Rob :)
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are s
Thats unique_together = ('Field1','Field2') Thanks for the
suggestion..
On May 17, 1:32 pm, Margaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> see FAQ underhttp://www.djangoproject.org
>
> On 5/17/07, nagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I Need to create object in which a unique key sho
see FAQ under http://www.djangoproject.org
On 5/17/07, nagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I Need to create object in which a unique key should be be created
> using more than one attribute of the object...
>
> How can I do that..?
>
>
> Any suggestions welcome..!
>
> Regs,
> Nagesh
>
>
Hi,
I Need to create object in which a unique key should be be created
using more than one attribute of the object...
How can I do that..?
Any suggestions welcome..!
Regs,
Nagesh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
20 matches
Mail list logo
