On 4/4/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to challenge the closing of
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2229#comment:4
>
> I do see Russell's point about syncdb not having schema-evolution
> behaviour for data fields, but it DOES have schema-evolution for
> missing tables
On 4/5/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, by law of order of operations, the and operator takes priority,
> so that would be (a == x and b == y) or c == z.
>
> However, in the if tag, combination of 'and' and 'or' in the same tag
> is not allowed, precisely because the orde
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 16:57 -0700, Simon G. wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I marked that as invalid since (as I understand it), we're trying to
> get rid of edit_inline. However, I'm not sure how far off the admin-
> newforms rewrite is, and it's probably a good idea to get this simple
> fix in anyway (es
On 4/6/07, Will McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But what does the following mean?
>
> {% ifequal a x and b y or c z %}
>
> Should all of the clauses be required to use the same operators? Ie,
> must they all use "and" or must they all use "or"? Maybe I'm just
> missing the simple logic
On Apr 5, 5:25 am, "Yann VR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to bring attention to the
> tickethttp://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3075
It looks like Adrian approves:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3075#comment:6
Used like so, the intent is clear:
{% ifequal a x and b y %}
{%
Hi Alex,
I marked that as invalid since (as I understand it), we're trying to
get rid of edit_inline. However, I'm not sure how far off the admin-
newforms rewrite is, and it's probably a good idea to get this simple
fix in anyway (especially if people are having problems with).
--Simon.
--~--
Well I can't help but post a more complete solution (;-)) located at
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/157/.
To be honest, I find Django tries very hard to be compliant with W3C
(adding things in favor of WCAG, using XHTML when possible, etc). This
usually isn't a problem because most browse
Hello All,
I have read here:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model-api/
"The semantics of one-to-one relationships will be changing soon, so
we don't recommend you use them. If that doesn't scare you away, keep
reading."
I have successfully used OneToOne field in many projects, and i
Hi All,
I found that Django can not serve PDF files from view, and I feel this
is wrong and must be fixed, so I try to raise this topic now.
Problem description:
We've build e-commerce site which sells PDF files as well. For obvious
reasons I can not put all our PDF files as static files on med
On Fri, Apr 06, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> I'm familiar with the problems. Fixing all occurrences is harder than
> understanding them, sadly. :-)
;-)
Well, I wasn't successful with the test case, and I don't know how much exposure
to computers I'll get during Eastern, but I've got to leave the
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:42 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> > I actually understand the problem now that it's been pointed out. Don't
> > waste too much time looking into this if you don't want. Your diagnosis
> > in the ticket is essentially correct.
On Fri, Apr 06, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> I actually understand the problem now that it's been pointed out. Don't
> waste too much time looking into this if you don't want. Your diagnosis
> in the ticket is essentially correct. You can see the same problem at
> the Python prompt. We have the eq
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> I thought all those discussion had been settled. There didn't seem to be
> any serious technical objections to named urls -- which both Adrian and
> I thought were a good approach -- so that's now in the tree. Which are
> still the open issues?
I remember of asking Adr
Hey Michael,
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 16:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > changeset [4919] made the escape filter tag return unicode strings inste
Hi Malcolm,
On Fri, Apr 06, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 16:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > changeset [4919] made the escape filter tag return unicode strings instead
> > of bytestrings, which seems to create problems as soon as you use non-ASCII
> > cha
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 16:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> changeset [4919] made the escape filter tag return unicode strings instead
> of bytestrings, which seems to create problems as soon as you use non-ASCII
> characters.
I've reverted that portion of the change. There's a whole rat
Hi,
changeset [4919] made the escape filter tag return unicode strings instead
of bytestrings, which seems to create problems as soon as you use non-ASCII
characters.
If you see any encoding problems, especially with oldforms or the admin
interface, please take a look at ticket #3924. The except
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:07 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> SmileyChris wrote:
> > Like you mentioned, it's quite a specific use-case for requiring a
> > variable in the {% url %} tag. To solve that case, just use
> > django.core.urlresolvers.reverse in your view and pass the url rather
> > than lea
SmileyChris wrote:
> Like you mentioned, it's quite a specific use-case for requiring a
> variable in the {% url %} tag. To solve that case, just use
> django.core.urlresolvers.reverse in your view and pass the url rather
> than leaving it to the template to resolve.
>
> -0
I'm -0 on this too wi
The Second Station of the Thirteenth
Word
In the Name of
God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.
[A conversation held
with some young people who, though surrounded by temptation, had not yet
lost their power of reason.]
Being assaulted by
the deceptive, seductive amusements of the present time,
I just wanted to bring attention to the ticket
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3075
which is a feature that would be so useful, I feel the need for it
regularly. I am surely not the only one and hence I am posting this.
Regards,
Yann
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
I have exactly the same issue with another kind of models (working
with lawyers here):
Class Contract:
client(..)
date(..)
Class SellContract:
contract= models.ForeignKey(Contract, edit_inline=true)
Class BuyContract:
contract= models.ForeignKey(Contract, edit_inline=true)
I'm current
22 matches
Mail list logo
