Re: Add a salt to the newforms fields names

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 06:48 +, Baptiste wrote: > That feature would be unable by default, and the user could use it > just for forms which didn't need to be autocompleted, eg. a comment > form (which can use cookies to remember the user, it is really more > powerful). Autocomplete isn't just

Re: Add a salt to the newforms fields names

That feature would be unable by default, and the user could use it just for forms which didn't need to be autocompleted, eg. a comment form (which can use cookies to remember the user, it is really more powerful). For the form which need it, like search forms, just no parameter scramble, and all w

Reminder: Summer of Code student applications are due on Monday!

How folks -- Just a quick reminder that Google Summer of Code student applications are due Monday! If you're a student and want to get paid to work on Django this summer, you should submit an application ASAP. We've only gotten a couple of good applications, so if you've got something interestin

Re: Add a salt to the newforms fields names

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 23:05 -0400, Jeremy Bowers wrote: > Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > I really don't like this approach to spam prevention as a general > > measure. > I would suggest a better approach would be to make it easier to include > a single randomized/hashed hidden input in the form, a

Easiest & Fastest Online Earning

Dear Friend, I sent you an email a couple of weeks ago about a new Internet company that is pre-launch right now. I do not know if you have had a chance to join yet, but if not here is link to do so http://www.agloco.com/r/BBCP2670 Referal ID : BBCP2670 AGLOCO™ is a global community, whose ow

Re: Add a salt to the newforms fields names

Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > I really don't like this approach to spam prevention as a general > measure. I would suggest a better approach would be to make it easier to include a single randomized/hashed hidden input in the form, and make it easy to verify the return of that input through middle

Management and PC Optimization

Best PC Optimization SoftwareMANAGEMENT TRAINGING AND CONTROLLING SOFTWARES The Business Consultants

Re: Problem with syncdb's handling of ManyToManyFields

On 3/22/07, Benjamin Slavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For full details, please see the ticket at: > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3779 > > Can anyone else confirm this so I can be sure it's not some wonky > configuration on my end? Hi Ben, Confirmed, and fixed in [4780]. Thanks for t

Re: Problem with syncdb's handling of ManyToManyFields

Hi Ben, On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:53 -0400, Benjamin Slavin wrote: > Howdy, folks, > > I'm in the process of migrating a Django project from MySQL to > PostgreSQL and think I may have stumbled across a nasty bug. It > relates to ManytoMany fields and the way in which syncdb creates the > databas

Re: Add a salt to the newforms fields names

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 21:06 +, Baptiste wrote: > Hello all, > > (Please apologize my bad English, don't mind about it and try to > understand... I'll do my best !) > > First, have a quick look on the spammer main method - I am talking > about bots, not human spammers that can't be filtered -

Re: Add a salt to the newforms fields names

In fact, after thinking more about it, I believe that it would be better to add the salt to BoundField, not to the form. That would be easier to use and to implement and would imply a method, called in the BaseForm before the conversion of data in BoundFields, which would "desalt" each key in the

Add a salt to the newforms fields names

Hello all, (Please apologize my bad English, don't mind about it and try to understand... I'll do my best !) First, have a quick look on the spammer main method - I am talking about bots, not human spammers that can't be filtered - : POST data are sent to the server with classical names of field

Re: Authentication issue (Proposal)

On Mar 22, 11:32 am, "Honza Král" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you can write a simple middleware that will check for this permission > in process_view(), it will examine the view function to find out what > application it belongs to and decide whether to allow the request to > continue or not...

View this page "Tripology.com is looking for a kickass Django/Python d

Click on http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/web/tripology-com-is-looking-for-a-kickass-django-python-developer - or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't work. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you a

Re: Authentication issue (Proposal)

Hi, On 3/22/07, Mario Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. I've got an issue that I want to deal with if you let me. I > think, as everybody we've got a project with many applications on it. > And also there are lots of users available, however what about if I > want to deny some apps

Authentication issue (Proposal)

Hello. I've got an issue that I want to deal with if you let me. I think, as everybody we've got a project with many applications on it. And also there are lots of users available, however what about if I want to deny some apps to some users? Or, how can I know what app can be used by someone

Re: newforms.util.ValidationError has nothing in common with core.validators.ValidationError. Why?

Hi Adrian, > Things are in flux with newforms right now, as they've been for a > while, so the only thing I can say is, please be patient. We're aware > of the fact that things are in flux, and, speaking as a perfectionist, > chances are that it bothers me even more than it bothers you. :) Thank

Re: Memory Leak with httpd.exe on Windows

Thanks, I'll give both solutions a try and see if they fix the issue. I believe the problem is related to debug=True because it seems like the memory usage increases whenever a SQL query is performed. Moses On Mar 21, 5:57 pm, "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moses Ting wrote: > >