On 2007-01-17, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> No apologies necessary. I've spent some time in Germany, so I
> understand the uniquely German approach to directness ;-)
> Unfortunately, it has been my experience that this doesn't always
> translate well - I just wanted to make it clear (particular
On 1/16/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry this has taken a while to look at - hopefully I'm not too late
to make a meaningful contribution...
Not a problem. I still haven't finished a patch yet and am certainly
still open to suggestions.
I would make another suggestio
On 1/17/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wouldn't have thought that it could raise feelings like this. Please
accept my apologies. English isn't my first language, and the usual
communication culture in Germany is very direct without people feeling
bad about it. It obviously loo
On 1/16/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking at this and the ModelAdminView class, and implied
subclassing of it by the inner Admin class of models, seems a bit...
weird. Is there a weird backwards-compatibility reason why something
which will be a view (and whose base class
Sorry this has taken a while to look at - hopefully I'm not too late
to make a meaningful contribution...
On 1/12/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Other than the fact that it's currently a tuple, is there any reason
not to change this to a dictionary? That'd feel cleaner and make it
On 1/14/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've written up some thoughts and goals for this branch:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/NewformsAdminBranch
I'm looking at this and the ModelAdminView class, and implied
subclassing of it by the inner Admin class of models, seems
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
On 1/16/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Victor Ng schrieb:
>
> Hey - any chance I'll get a schema evo-branch before 1.0?
What's the point in making Victor wait all the time? He has asked
multiple times for a branch, and nobody makes any decision
Jacob and I have decided it's a good idea to get a Django meetup going
at PyCon. A few people have expressed interest in attending the
tutorials but it seems they are full already.
I've set up an initial agenda, which is completely open to change if
better ideas come along (so let me know if you
I think this should be really high on the priority list of the core
django team because, as many have said, everybody here is a volunteer,
and personally many times I would be thinking of investing some time to
implement a feature in django thinking that it might be useful for
other people (inste
On Jan 16, 6:42 pm, Scott Paul Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use LDAP a bit differently. Using the LDAPBackend in ticket #2507
works rather well for me. When I wrote the patch, I understood that to
use the current auth system means to make User objects. I for one was
happy with this bec
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:49:51AM -, PoBK wrote:
> I'm not certain how anyone else feels about this, but personally, I
> hate the fact that I have to have a DB for authorization if using the
> contributed auth module. AAA should be one entity since it breaks the
> whole loosely decoupled DRY p
http://simon.net.nz/articles/django-database-export-v1/ is nice :)
I was refering to something more than ju a way to make dumps - a
dumper which has an admin page where I could select what to dump and
other options.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
On 1/16/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're attributing to malice that which can be adequately explained by
the fact that we are all very busy people. Read Jacob's last post. He
pretty much said he is happy to give Victor access - he just needs to
find the time to do it. I
* gabor wrote, On 14.01.2007 12:19:
hi,
what is the status/future of validation-aware models? is it planned to
have them in django-1.0? last year there was some activity regarding
them, so the models do have a validate() method, but it does not seem to
be complete.
As I wrote in another m
Your solution looks good to me, as it adds more power to generic views
keeping their behavior consistent, without exceptions (and this point
was exactly what I tried to express in #3134).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 1/16/07, John Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy all,
I've just finished my first look at newforms and there would seem to
be one fairly obvious omission (though I may still be stuck in the
oldforms/manipulators way of thinking).
Validation over multiple fields, especially things l
On Jan 11, 11:36 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* The real thing we've been discussing, though, is a way for apps to get ahold
of users after they've been created by a third-party authenticator. For
example, on my sites I'm gonna want everyone to have a username whether they
u
On 1/16/07, CosyGlow42 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm getting the following error, doesn't matter what I'm doing to fix
it. I've already used all the advice given in simular topic and scanned
my sys.path for the Python24 path multple time. I've also compared my
sys.path by going through the Exp
Howdy all,
I've just finished my first look at newforms and there would seem to
be one fairly obvious omission (though I may still be stuck in the
oldforms/manipulators way of thinking).
Validation over multiple fields, especially things like the "required
if other field..." validators that are
On 1/16/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Victor Ng schrieb:
>
> Hey - any chance I'll get a schema evo-branch before 1.0?
What's the point in making Victor wait all the time? He has asked
multiple times for a branch, and nobody makes any decision :-(
You're attributing to
I'm getting the following error, doesn't matter what I'm doing to fix
it. I've already used all the advice given in simular topic and scanned
my sys.path for the Python24 path multple time. I've also compared my
sys.path by going through the Explore function on the Start of the
TaskBar and that i
I'm getting the following error, doesn't matter what I'm doing to fix
it. I've already used all the advice given in simular topic and scanned
my sys.path for the Python24 path multple time. I've also compared my
sys.path by going through the Explore function on the Start of the
TaskBar and that i
22 matches
Mail list logo
