On 1/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For a contact form, I think it would be a common use-case that you
would want to pre-populate name and email address if you were
registered. In fact, I'm trying to do this right now and don't see an
easy way to do it without subclassing t
Ooops. I see that Russell beat me to the punch. Either way it's good
to see that we both came up with similar approaches to solving the
problem. Surely that counts for something ;)
-Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscri
On 1/6/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/5/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> see the 'initial' parameter for field...
> it is failry new, so you might want to run svn up...
Yes, and I just added documentation for that feature last night:
http://www.djangoprojec
If Waylan's approach is incorrect, then what would be the preferred
manner to pre-populate dynamic data?
For a contact form, I think it would be a common use-case that you
would want to pre-populate name and email address if you were
registered. In fact, I'm trying to do this right now and don'
On 1/5/07, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Prior to `initial` being available, I created a static (although is
could be a dynamically populated) dict, and passed that in when
initializing a blank form. Being I never validated the form, no errors
appeared. So that is another option.
I
On 1/5/07, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The immediate use case for me is hidden fields. The user can't fill in
> a hidden field, so this data must come from the form initialization;
> but if you provide a sparse data set on initialization, the first
> presentation of the form will
On 1/5/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using newforms in anger recently, and I've hit a bit of a
hurdle. There might be an obvious way around this, but I can't see it.
If you define a form, you can instantiate it with no data, or you can
instantiate it wit
On 1/5/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
see the 'initial' parameter for field...
it is failry new, so you might want to run svn up...
Yes, and I just added documentation for that feature last night:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/newforms/#initial
Adrian
--
Adrian Ho
see the 'initial' parameter for field...
it is failry new, so you might want to run svn up...
On 1/6/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using newforms in anger recently, and I've hit a bit of a
hurdle. There might be an obvious way around this, but I can't see
Hi All,
I've been using newforms in anger recently, and I've hit a bit of a
hurdle. There might be an obvious way around this, but I can't see it.
If you define a form, you can instantiate it with no data, or you can
instantiate it with complete data (binding the form). However, what if
you onl
Or, maybe, a better solution would be to keep the distinction (since
it is useful for debugging) but rename it.
The core problem, I think, is that Django is primarily used for web
applications, which means that everything revolves around HTTP
request/response cycles. And in that context, "does n
On 1/5/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No can do -- that would couple the database layer to HTTP, which
wouldn't be a good thing.
I wonder, though, if this is a case of practicality beating purity;
also, it's incredibly ugly to raise an exception that says "I couldn't
find what
Hi,
On 1/5/07, vizcayno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip discussion of "lite" connection strings vs. TNS]
To properly specify a database connection you'd also need provision
for a port number (the listener port). While that seems like a
reasonable idea, TNS is a better mechanism as it abstra
Hello:
Assuming I have an Oracle database with next connection info:
user = scott
pass = tiger
host = Oracle host Name or IP address
ORCL = Name of database
with no tnsnames.ora file
1) From command line I can do:
sqlplus scott/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ORCL
2) From a Python script:
import
On 1/5/07, Tool69 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you Baxter,
you avoid me a big waste of time and effort. I was studing my Django
code, and couldn't find the answer.
The problem was solved in changing kib2.webfactionnal.com to 1, as you
said.
Cross-posting this to django-developers because I
15 matches
Mail list logo
