Web application demo, need users

2006-12-11 Thread ramzabean
Hello, I am doing a (free) public web application that allows you to submit popular web links or post interesting ads. It is currently early in development; so you can post any feedback or other suggestions. http://www.botspiritcompany.com/botlist/ Thanks, Berlin --~--~-~--~~---

Re: django.contrib.formtools: High-level abstractions of common form tasks

2006-12-11 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:52:19AM -0800, Kevin wrote: > I'm mainly concerned with the scenario where credit cards are used as > part of the form. I haven't found too many supported cryptography > libraries for python though. > As far as crypto libraries go, I've used the Python Cryptography Too

Re: Re: Re: Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread James Bennett
On 12/11/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, in our dj codebase, logging out doesn't expire the session > cookie. I'll have a look at trunk. I agree it's a useful property. So, if I'm understanding you, the problem situation would look like this: 1. Alice logs in, does some stuf

Re: Re: Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 12/11/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/11/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Doesn't this create a small chance that messages intended for one user > > would be given to another user this way? > > Not that I can tell; two users should never be sharing an insta

Re: Re: Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread James Bennett
On 12/11/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doesn't this create a small chance that messages intended for one user > would be given to another user this way? Not that I can tell; two users should never be sharing an instance of Session. -- "May the forces of evil become confused on

Re: Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread Benjamin Slavin
On 12/11/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone have strong feelings one way or another? +1 (with caveat) Messages are valuable in both cases (per-user and per-session). I have an application that leaves messages for a user outside of a session context (a scheduled process runs a

Re: django.contrib.formtools: High-level abstractions of common form tasks

2006-12-11 Thread Chad Maine
On 12/11/06, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I like the idea of storing an encoded-pickled version of the form data > in a hidden field. I'm concerned about privacy implications with > sharing that data with the client. What about encrypting the contents > too? The server could have a pri

Re: django.contrib.formtools: High-level abstractions of common form tasks

2006-12-11 Thread Rob Hudson
Isn't the session a natural place to store these kinds of things? Is there a reason for the avoidance of sessions? Are they buggy? Do they require some sort of over-head people are trying to avoid? Just curious, Rob On 20061211.1152, Kevin said ... > > I like the idea of storing an encoded-p

Re: django.contrib.formtools: High-level abstractions of common form tasks

2006-12-11 Thread Kevin
I like the idea of storing an encoded-pickled version of the form data in a hidden field. I'm concerned about privacy implications with sharing that data with the client. What about encrypting the contents too? The server could have a private key that it encrypts the serialized form data and de

Re: DjangoPoweredSites wiki article vandalised, please revert

2006-12-11 Thread Michael Radziej
Now it's there! Thanks! -- noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg - Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100 http://www.noris.de - The IT-Outsourcing Company --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: DjangoPoweredSites wiki article vandalised, please revert

2006-12-11 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 12/11/06 12:13 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > It seems to be missing now... > http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoPoweredSites Yeah, I [EMAIL PROTECTED] it up. Fixed (to last night's backup), ugh. Jacob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because

Re: DjangoPoweredSites wiki article vandalised, please revert

2006-12-11 Thread Michael Radziej
Jacob Kaplan-Moss schrieb: > Fixed; thanks for pointing it out. No, now it's empty. Quite an improvement, but not the whole thing ;-) Michael -- noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg - Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100 http://www.noris.de - The IT-Outsourcing

Re: DjangoPoweredSites wiki article vandalised, please revert

2006-12-11 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 12/11/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fixed; thanks for pointing it out. > It seems to be missing now... http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoPoweredSites --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: DjangoPoweredSites wiki article vandalised, please revert

2006-12-11 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Fixed; thanks for pointing it out. Jacob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this g

Re: Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 12/11/06, Zak Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > James Bennett wrote: > > Which leads me to wonder whether it wouldn't be better to just do that > > in Django itself, and move the Message model into > > django.contrib.sessions. > > +1. Associating messages with sessions is much more intuit

Re: Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread Zak Johnson
James Bennett wrote: > Which leads me to wonder whether it wouldn't be better to just do that > in Django itself, and move the Message model into > django.contrib.sessions. +1. Associating messages with sessions is much more intuitive to me; when first switching to Django, I was surprised they d

Re: DjangoPoweredSites wiki article vandalised, please revert

2006-12-11 Thread Benjamin Slavin
I can verify that this is indeed a problem and that Akismet does not allow normal users to revert the content. Version 442 seems to be an un-vandalised version (and is more recent thant 438) --Ben On 12/11/06, Matias Hermarud Fjeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. > > http://code.djangop

Re: Django Templates and BOM (byte order marks)

2006-12-11 Thread Bastos
I've created a script that detect BOM in a directory: http://tiago.zusee.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/findbompy.txt Helpfull when you have a lot of files... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "D

Re: django.contrib.formtools: High-level abstractions of common form tasks

2006-12-11 Thread Afternoon
We are definitely interested in sharing, that was our initial intention. The code is by no means finished, but my colleague Tom will post an interim version and some notes on our design soon. Hopefully it will be interesting. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received t

Re: Re: Default representation of a Form

2006-12-11 Thread Benjamin Slavin
On 12/11/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an interesting idea, but I think it's important to remember > the as_p(), as_table() and as_ul() shortcut methods are just > *shortcuts*. There's nothing stopping a developer from writing a > custom method on a Form, nor is there an

Re: Ticket #914: Admin js option does not honor absolute urls

2006-12-11 Thread Matias Hermarud Fjeld
Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On 12/8/06, Matias Hermarud Fjeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've submitted a patch on ticket #914. The patch changes the behavior of >> the include_admin_script-templatetag. Should this have a regression test >> as well? If so, in what file should i put the test? >

Re: Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
James Bennett wrote: > Of course, this would be a backwards-incompatible change and would > require refactoring of Django and of any end-user applications which > were using the messages framework We could maintain compatibility to some extent by replacing User.messages with some bridge object w

Thinking out loud: move auth.Messages into the sessions app?

2006-12-11 Thread James Bennett
Lately I've been seeing a lot of people running into the problem of needing something resembling the auth app's message framework, but being unable to use it because they need to display messages to users who aren't associated with an auth.User instance. It seems to me that the easiest thing to d

Re: Default representation of a Form

2006-12-11 Thread Gábor Farkas
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > On 12/10/06, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What if instead of adding various as_* methods that we have a >> FormFormatter class that determines how the form displays. The >> _html_output and as_* methods would become FormFormatters. Formatter >> could be a p

DjangoPoweredSites wiki article vandalised, please revert

2006-12-11 Thread Matias Hermarud Fjeld
Hello. http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoPoweredSites has been vandalized and should be reverted to version 438. Ironically, Akismet didn't let me revert the change myself. :-) -- Matias Hermanrud Fjeld --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message bec