Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 11/6/06, Brian Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > search-api has a wiki page here: > http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/TextIndexingAbstractionLayer > > There is currently one supported indexer (Lucene) and a couple > experimental (Xapian). It needs polish. I blogged about the status a > whil

Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread Victor Ng
What problems have you had with schema evolution? We're pretty commited to using Django over at my company - and I need schema evolution badly - so I'll be starting to kick the s-o branch starting tomorrow afternoon to see if it's stable enough for us. If necessary, I can apply patches myself as

Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread Brian Beck
Gábor Farkas wrote: > - search-api > - i could not find any documentation about it search-api has a wiki page here: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/TextIndexingAbstractionLayer There is currently one supported indexer (Lucene) and a couple experimental (Xapian). It needs polish. I blog

Re: psyucopg2 status

2006-11-06 Thread falcon
I've been using it as well, no problems so far. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from

Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread Matthew Flanagan
On 07/11/06, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jay Parlar wrote: > > On 11/6/06, David Blewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would like to suggest that the branches that are felt to be complete > >> sans testing be merged into a single branch. I am anxiously awaiting > >> several dif

Re: FullHistory branch (Was: Branch Merges)

2006-11-06 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 11/7/06, Ramiro Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The message also contained a couple of patches to fix some > brokeness I found in the code. I don't dare to submit a patch for a branch to > the main Django Trac, (btw, what's the policy in this respect?) but I could > post the patch here.

Re: psyucopg2 status

2006-11-06 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 11/6/06 6:28 PM, orestis wrote: > In IRC, Jacob KM told me that he is using psycopg2 everywhere now, so I > think that this should be done. Indeed I am; it works just fine. For now, I'd just suggest using the "postgresql_psycopg2" backend. At some point, we should probably rename that one "

Re: psyucopg2 status

2006-11-06 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 11/7/06, Gary Doades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I notice that the documentation is still recommending psycopg1 and not > psycopg2 for PostgreSQL. Psycopg2 has been in release status for quite > a while now. The psycopg site is now firmly recommending psycopg2 and > noting that psycopg1 is e

Re: psyucopg2 status

2006-11-06 Thread orestis
In IRC, Jacob KM told me that he is using psycopg2 everywhere now, so I think that this should be done. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email t

psyucopg2 status

2006-11-06 Thread Gary Doades
I notice that the documentation is still recommending psycopg1 and not psycopg2 for PostgreSQL. Psycopg2 has been in release status for quite a while now. The psycopg site is now firmly recommending psycopg2 and noting that psycopg1 is effectively obsolete. It may be better for the documentation,

Re: Re: Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 11/6/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/6/06, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so, in short, the only testable branches seems to be fullHistory and > > rowLevelPermissions, and even there it's not clear if they are now > > considered done, or still in progress. >

Re: NYC New York City Django developers

2006-11-06 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Hey Brian -- Welcome to the community :) You'll probably get a must better response if you post this to django-users; django-dev is used for discussion of developing Django itself, not discussions of using Django. Oh, and I myself have had great luck hiring people after posts on django-users

NYC New York City Django developers

2006-11-06 Thread Brian
Hi, New to the group. I just took over the website for a smaller, weekly newspaper in NYC, and I am looking at completely rebuilding the system with a Django framework. Do you have any suggestions how I can find a good lead Django developer in NYC. Are there job boards etc, besides this I shou

Re: Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread James Bennett
On 11/6/06, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so, in short, the only testable branches seems to be fullHistory and > rowLevelPermissions, and even there it's not clear if they are now > considered done, or still in progress. Yeah, it's a bit confusing. Could we get status reports from bra

FullHistory branch (Was: Branch Merges)

2006-11-06 Thread Ramiro Morales
On 11/6/06, David Blewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds good to me. What do we need to do here? I'd like to help out > with the FullHistory branch. It looks like it hasn't had trunk merged > to it in a while. > Find below a message I sent to Uros Trebec, the owner of the branch, a couple

Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread Gábor Farkas
Jay Parlar wrote: > On 11/6/06, David Blewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to suggest that the branches that are felt to be complete >> sans testing be merged into a single branch. I am anxiously awaiting >> several different branch merges to core but do not have time to check >> eac

Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread David Blewett
James Bennett wrote: > So let me reiterate the call for anyone who wants to bang on a branch > to step up; we'll set you up with access to commit code and let you > bang away on it to your heart's content :) Sounds good to me. What do we need to do here? I'd like to help out with the FullHistor

Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread James Bennett
On 11/6/06, David Blewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to suggest that the branches that are felt to be complete > sans testing be merged into a single branch. I am anxiously awaiting > several different branch merges to core but do not have time to check > each individual one out to

Re: Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread Jay Parlar
On 11/6/06, David Blewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to suggest that the branches that are felt to be complete > sans testing be merged into a single branch. I am anxiously awaiting > several different branch merges to core but do not have time to check > each individual one out t

Branch Merges?

2006-11-06 Thread David Blewett
I would like to suggest that the branches that are felt to be complete sans testing be merged into a single branch. I am anxiously awaiting several different branch merges to core but do not have time to check each individual one out to test them. Maybe it's time to begin a larger effort, similar

Re: ANN: Django's Trac installation has been upgraded

2006-11-06 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 11/6/06 11:57 AM, Christopher Lenz wrote: > About template breakage: we generally recommend that you make as few > changes/overrides to the templates as absolutely necessary, for > exactly the reason that such changes make upgrades harder. You can do > a lot using only the site_css, site_

Re: ANN: Django's Trac installation has been upgraded

2006-11-06 Thread Christopher Lenz
Am 06.11.2006 um 18:43 schrieb Jacob Kaplan-Moss: > I know that a few things on the code site are still broken or > looking ugly; > I'm stupid when it comes to upgrading Trac and I always seem to break > templates. I'll be working on that throughout the day. Great to see you've upgraded :-) Ab

Re: ANN: Django's Trac installation has been upgraded

2006-11-06 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Hey again -- Duh, I forgot the most important part: if you've entered a valid name and email on the "settings" page (http://code.djangoproject.com/settings), the new spam filter will treat you much nicer. So if you get something legitimate rejected, try entering a name and email. Thanks! Ja

ANN: Django's Trac installation has been upgraded

2006-11-06 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Hi folks -- In an attempt to better deal with the spam problems we've been having, I've upgraded Django's Trac installation to a newer version. More importantly, I've upgraded the spam filter plugin so, with luck, we'll be able to reject more spam and have fewer false-positives. Many, many t

Help on solving ticket #2522 and #2470

2006-11-06 Thread mario
I'd like to try to fix the bug for ticket #2522 and #2470 (both are apparently the same). I'm studying the code and trying to understand the possible reason for ther error. Although new to Django, I have a reasonable knowledge of Python. However, I'd like some help from someone more experienced w

Re: 3rd party auth backend access to session object

2006-11-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I am using django.contrib.auth "backends" style login/validation. This makes it so I do not have to implement the actual login request processing, only provide a backend class that offers authenticate() and get_user() methods. perhaps a third function can be optional: add_to_session(d

Re: Django mail.py Message-ID header

2006-11-06 Thread graham_king
Great. A patch it is. Askimet is refusing everything I enter into a new ticket, every single paragraph from my post individually, and even the standard Lorem Ipsum paragraph - something isn't right, so please accept my ticket here: --- Title: Adding Message-ID header in core/mail.py Body: A

Re: Should we have another 'post_save' signal?

2006-11-06 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
* medhat wrote, On 01.11.2006 00:13: > Hi, > I was trying to create a thumbnail from an ImageField when the object > is saved. I tried different things but none of them worked the way I > wanted. Then I thought of using the post_save signal to do it only to > discover that this signal is sent aft

Re: off-topic: filebrowser svn setup

2006-11-06 Thread James Crasta
On 11/6/06, patrickk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks - it´s been difficult enough. > we´re doing the latest setup right now (permissions and stuff), then > updating to the latest version. > it should be done within the next 2 days or so - I´ll post the URL > here ... > > patrick > Excellent

Re: off-topic: filebrowser svn setup

2006-11-06 Thread patrickk
thanks - it´s been difficult enough. we´re doing the latest setup right now (permissions and stuff), then updating to the latest version. it should be done within the next 2 days or so - I´ll post the URL here ... patrick Am 06.11.2006 um 11:28 schrieb Aidas Bendoraitis: > > Congratulations

Re: off-topic: filebrowser svn setup

2006-11-06 Thread Aidas Bendoraitis
Congratulations about setting up the FileBrowser under svn! By the way, if the FileBrowser project is open to public, what is the URL for the latest and greatest revision? Regards, Aidas Bendoraitis On 11/5/06, patrickk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks. > > Am 05.11.2006 um 20:34 schrieb

Re: Random ProgrammingErrors when using PostgreSQL

2006-11-06 Thread orestis
Interesting. Shouldn't the debug view make absolutely sure that no exceptions/error are raised uncaught ? Or if there is now way to do something meaningful with the exception, at least present it in a meaningful way. I wonder what the devs have to say on this. I'd file an enhancement ticket, tho

Re: Random ProgrammingErrors when using PostgreSQL

2006-11-06 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
orestis wrote: > I wonder why does a cursor has to be involved for the debug page to be > shown... I'll look into it. Debug page shows repr()'s for many local objects for each level of the call stack. And repr()'s of models often do some queries to show readable representation. --~--~-