Am 17.07.2006 um 16:59 schrieb Adrian Holovaty:
> On 7/17/06, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i can do it by setting the allow_tags attribute to true
>> for the given "something" :)
>>
>> but this feature is not documented, so before i use it in an
>> application, i'd like to ask:
>>
>>
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 13:31 +1000, Matthew Flanagan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This ticket #1891 [1] has been outstanding for quite a while. I'm in
> the process of rolling out a large application that would really
> benefit from this being fixed. Is anyone able to look at it?
>
> Malcolm, di
Hi,
This ticket #1891 [1] has been outstanding for quite a while. I'm in
the process of rolling out a large application that would really
benefit from this being fixed. Is anyone able to look at it?
Malcolm, did you ever get around to proving your idea in your last
comment in the ticket?
[1] h
Hi Gary,
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:12 -0700, Gary Wilson wrote:
> Patch for is_authenticated implementation with doc changes and no
> deprecation warnings in is_anonymous. Please review.
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/2332/is_authenticated.2.diff
I'm going to sit down this
Yes. All works now. Thank you Adrian.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
Patch for is_authenticated implementation with doc changes and no
deprecation warnings in is_anonymous. Please review.
http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/2332/is_authenticated.2.diff
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are su
> """
> 2006-07-17 17:13:08,419 Trac[__init__] WARNING: 500 Internal Error
> (Akismet rejected spam)
> """
>
> Seems to be working.
Good to hear.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers"
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Gary Wilson wrote:
> > Has anyone seen/tried the Akismet spam filtering plugin for Trac:
> > http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/SpamFilter#Akismet
> >
> > Would be nice for Django's trac.
>
> Enabled -- let's see how it works :)
>From the log fil
On Jul 17, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Gary Wilson wrote:
> Has anyone seen/tried the Akismet spam filtering plugin for Trac:
> http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/SpamFilter#Akismet
>
> Would be nice for Django's trac.
Enabled -- let's see how it works :)
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
Has anyone seen/tried the Akismet spam filtering plugin for Trac:
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/SpamFilter#Akismet
Would be nice for Django's trac.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers
This portability by the lowest common denominator is a screwed up way
of thinking (IMHO).
I mean.. how many people write apps and suddenly switch backends half
way through development?
Having them in the core with a big warning saying that they are mysql
only would be ok I think. (similar
Brantley Harris wrote:
> Is there any discussion on the fate of manipulators? I've done a lot
> on my own to make it more managable (including making a very cool
> 'remote manipulator that executes via ajax'), so I'd like to see where
> this is all going, a plan or what not.
Whoa! I was just th
Hi all -- I wrote a patch and explanation for
http://code.djangoproject.org/ticket/1207 but haven't heard anything
for two months, so I wanted to see if people thought it was a bug and
if the patch is correct.
If you omit a field on a creation form then try to save via the
AddManipulator, when yo
Oops that was supposed to go to user list, sorry.
Iain Duncan wrote:
> Hello fellow djangoers. I've been doing a gallery site that is too image
> heavy for it's own good ( yes, I'm subcontracted by a graphic designer
> ... ), and am trying to find good ways to control image loading so that
> the
On 7/17/06, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does your patch work? In your example, would it just add
> > {'weblog_slug': 'guestbook'} to every infodict in the included
> > URLconf?
> it is a fairly simple change (so maybe I over looked something)
Hi Martin,
That answers my question
Martin wrote:
> Once a sub_match as beed found (in `RegexURLResolver.resolve`) the dict
> passed to the contructor of `RegexURLResolver` will be merged with the
> dict of prefix-match, the sub_match (so instead of merging 2 dict, now
> 3 dict are merged and the default_args dict has to lowest `pri
Hi Adrian,
> How does your patch work? In your example, would it just add
> {'weblog_slug': 'guestbook'} to every infodict in the included
> URLconf?
it is a fairly simple change (so maybe I over looked something)
I only had to change to files:
conf/urls/defaults.py
just pass the third para
Geert Vanderkelen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm currently looking into a possibility to define per Model which MySQL
> Storage Engine it should use for creating the table. This would need a new
> option called 'db_table_option' for the Model.
..
Ok. Sorry for the noise, idea binned by all mighty FAQ. :
On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No.. This is about table options. All of them! Not only storage engine
> choice. All of the table options anyone can imagine.
And "all of the table options anyone can imagine" are supported by
that FAQ answer, as long as they can be appli
On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No.. This is about table options. All of them! Not only storage engine
> choice. All of the table options anyone can imagine.
I still feel like it's way too much of a special case to try to do
this; the proposed option of an "anything goe
Hi James,
James Bennett wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..
> 1) The features common to all the RDBMS products it can be used with.
> 2) A way to manually tweak its SQL output to take advantage of
> features which only apply to one database.
Well, my 'manually' t
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm currently looking into a possibility to define per Model which MySQL
>> Storage Engine it should use for creating the table. This would need a new
>> option called 'db_table_option' for the Model.
On 7/16/06, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just recently found out that if you use the 'include' feature to
> refer to a external URl config file the default parameter dict is
> silently ingored, e.g.:
>
> urlpatterns = patterns \
> ( ""
> , ( r"^lce/guestbook", include ("lce_at.bl
On 7/17/06, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i can do it by setting the allow_tags attribute to true
> for the given "something" :)
>
> but this feature is not documented, so before i use it in an
> application, i'd like to ask:
>
> could this be documented, or is this something that will
On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This storage engine choice was only an example. There are lots of other
> options which can be set per table.
> As Honza replied, this is not MySQL specific and PostgreSQL as well as other
> DBMS accept options like these.
But pretty much
On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently looking into a possibility to define per Model which MySQL
> Storage Engine it should use for creating the table. This would need a new
> option called 'db_table_option' for the Model.
>
> Not only for MySQL would this be han
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> When a variable is evaluated in a context in a template, it is
> considered to be either "safe" or not (Simon used the term "escaped",
> but that seemed less universally true than "safe").
As long as we're discussing terminology, might as well enumerate the
situations
Hi James,
James Bennett wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Not only for MySQL would this be handy, for other backends as well. I think
>> for PostgreSQL the inheritance feature would need this too.
>
> How so? Postgres doesn't have multiple storage engines like
Hi Malcolm,
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 12:15 +0200, Geert Vanderkelen wrote:
>> A follow-up on my previous post, with a patch attached to make the
>> db_table_options work, which was easy to put in.
>>
>> Any comments on this patch, or something I looked over? Otherwise I
On 7/17/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not only for MySQL would this be handy, for other backends as well. I think
> > for PostgreSQL the inheritance feature would need this too.
>
> How so? Postgres doesn't have multipl
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> If you want to mark every "still needs cooking" string then you have to
> mark *every* string that comes into the system (a la Perl's tainted
> strings).
Nonono ... I just was talking about terminology. We need a term
for "safe" and "unsafe" strings. I take it as gra
On 7/17/06, Geert Vanderkelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not only for MySQL would this be handy, for other backends as well. I think
> for PostgreSQL the inheritance feature would need this too.
How so? Postgres doesn't have multiple storage engines like MySQL
does; a Postgres table is a Postgr
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 12:15 +0200, Geert Vanderkelen wrote:
> A follow-up on my previous post, with a patch attached to make the
> db_table_options work, which was easy to put in.
>
> Any comments on this patch, or something I looked over? Otherwise I make a
> feature request with it, unless I
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 12:00 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 21:30 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> >> I'm more for 'escaped' and 'raw', but not really violently. This is a
> >> minor issue, and I wouldn't like to get the work delayed by it.
>
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 03:30 -0700, SmileyChris wrote:
> Great job on the patch, Malcom!
> I posted this in the ticket, then felt guilty because you told me not
> to. So I'll post here for discusion.
>
> A couple of points:
> If a markup filter fails due to an import error, I don't think it
> shou
Great job on the patch, Malcom!
I posted this in the ticket, then felt guilty because you told me not
to. So I'll post here for discusion.
A couple of points:
If a markup filter fails due to an import error, I don't think it
should be marked as safe.
>From a skim read of the patch, I'm missing th
A follow-up on my previous post, with a patch attached to make the
db_table_options work, which was easy to put in.
Any comments on this patch, or something I looked over? Otherwise I make a
feature request with it, unless I missed it while searching for an existing
one..
-Geert
Geert Vanderk
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 21:30 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
>> I'm more for 'escaped' and 'raw', but not really violently. This is a
>> minor issue, and I wouldn't like to get the work delayed by it.
>> Also ... I volunteer to rewrite the docs if these terms change. B
Hi!
I'm currently looking into a possibility to define per Model which MySQL
Storage Engine it should use for creating the table. This would need a new
option called 'db_table_option' for the Model.
Not only for MySQL would this be handy, for other backends as well. I think
for PostgreSQL the
Hi!
I was a bit playing around and missed MySQL ENUM and SET column types.
Instead of adding them to the MySQL backend, I just created a new app in the
contrib/ directory called 'mysqlext'.
http://some-abstract-type.com/code/?cmd=manifest;manifest=76d4a786cf3bd215546af6f1bcf2d12309515d43;path=
Hi django-developers,
a generic api for registration of new fields would be a good idea.
As IOC, FIFA and ISO-3166 codes are not the same this won't help me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_IOC%2C_FIFA%2C_and_ISO_3166_country_codes
But IOC, FIFA and ISO-3166 should have the same api.
Hello fellow djangoers. I've been doing a gallery site that is too image
heavy for it's own good ( yes, I'm subcontracted by a graphic designer
... ), and am trying to find good ways to control image loading so that
the user will wait and then see all the numerous and large images at the
same time
hi,
i've found (by browsing the source-code),
that if i want to put raw html code into a column
in django.contrib.admin's list views,
i can do it by setting the allow_tags attribute to true
for the given "something" :)
but this feature is not documented, so before i use it in an
application, i
43 matches
Mail list logo
