Hi Dear Members,
FOLLOWING R THE NEW JOBS OF THE DAY :
Marketing Executives
international IT recruiter
overseas jobs in singapore,russia,
overseas jobs in u.k., australia
PCB Design engineer
Looking for .Net professionals
Marketing Executive
Data Entry Operator
Requirement of Clerical Ad
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 22:50 -0600, m h wrote:
> I'll just post the contents of my bug report. Has anyone else ran
> into this? Any hints, suggestions?
>
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2297
This isn't a bug. You are using foo_set incorrectly (it is not an
attribute on the Bar model,
I'll just post the contents of my bug report. Has anyone else ran
into this? Any hints, suggestions?
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2297
I revved to v3278 and my app broke. In my view I adjust some fields of
the model.
My model looks something like this (quite simplified)
class Foo(
Hi Malcom,
Thanks for the comments.
Does the template source *need* to provide information on what is
escaped or not?
The view is handling a lot of the output format anyway, I personally
don't see a problem with looking there to see how a template is being
escaped.
Then again, I guess escaping
On 7/6/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wealready spend enough time helping with people with basic Apacheconfiguration; many of us would get it right, but they aren't the oneswho will be posting to the mailing lists. Do we need the extrainconvenience?
True. This is a very compellin
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:50 -0700, SmileyChris wrote:
[...]
> My proposal is that we don't use a {% autoescape on/off %} block tag or
> a new |raw filter in the template source at all, but rather always use
> the view to set it the auto-escaping status.
> The developer wanting to use autoescaping
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 10:11 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>
> On 7/6/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anybody have thoughts about this?
>
> Thinking about it further, I am more and more inclined to go
> with option
> #2
On 7/6/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anybody have thoughts about this?Thinking about it further, I am more and more inclined to go with option#2: don't mess with the environment when running Django componentsembedded in another application. But I may be insane (the phrase has
ce
> Yes, Django should be accessible to newbies, but newbie-friendliness
> needs to be balanced against the needs of experienced web developers
> (who likely already know all about XSS).
To exume an old horse and continue beating it, experienced web
developers may know all about XSS, but they will
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 19:08 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> I was having a discussion today with a client who are using Django
> templates inside their own code, without using the ORM or views.
>
> It initially started out because they were using the old
>
> os.environ['DJANGO_SETTING
Hi all,
I finnally settled on lighttpd + django runfastcgi as my devel
environment.
It's just wonderful mainly becausse I run the httpd server as myself,
no need root permissions or anything and fastcgi is the only thing
I get from my ISP.
But how can I force a server reload when I change m
I finally wanted it bad enough to code it. Here's the patch. The
template tags could use a little cleanup which I'll finish off if
Jacob and Adrian give this the green light. I copied and pasted some
code :(
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2292
A couple of issues:
- Should the app names o
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Filipe wrote:
> > and the first changes towards that will start appearing in python 2.5:
> > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0332/
>
> Er, no -- that PEP was actually rejected. My impression is that the
> str/unicode distinction won't be
On 7/5/06, Filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and the first changes towards that will start appearing in python 2.5:
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0332/
That's rejected, so not actually in 2.5, right?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
On Jul 5, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Filipe wrote:
> and the first changes towards that will start appearing in python 2.5:
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0332/
Er, no -- that PEP was actually rejected. My impression is that the
str/unicode distinction won't be eliminated until Py3k.
Jacob
--~-
Andrey Golovizin wrote:
> Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> > "... with too many backwards-incompatible changes ..." -- as Hugo
> > points out, this will break a lot of existing code.
> Well, some day Django will have to switch to unicode anyway (even Python-3000
> is going to use unicode strings everywh
16 matches
Mail list logo
