On 7/4/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was merged already, should I fix the wiki start page?
I've taken care of it. Thanks for the pointer!
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mes
On 7/4/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fingers crossed about that lame-assed ORM patent -- so I'll do what
Patents don't have much to do with copyright. ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:05 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
>> From Wikipedia[1]:
>
> Under the U.S. Copyright Act, a transfer of ownership in
> copyright must be memorialized in a writing signed by the
> transferor. For that purpose, ownership in copyright includes
> exclusive l
Jan.
a CLA protects from people changing their minds as well, and in some
cases actually
assets that the person assigning the copyright over is the actual owner.
from my point of view it should be weighed up as follows:
cons of having people sign a CLA:
- about 20 minutes if they are an indivi
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 08:05 -0700, jws wrote:
> > They should be added, since we are bound to get some edge cases wrong
> > (c.f. initial SQL parsing) and having regression tests will help there.
> > If you could add those, that would be great. Testing both sorts of
> > quotes, backslashes, semico
On wo, 2006-06-21 at 13:52 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> We don't; my conversations with the company lawyers seemed to
> indicate that you're implicitly assigning copyright simply by
> submitting code to an OSS project. Of course IANAL, but I'm going to
> trust what the ones we talked t
On wo, 2006-06-21 at 13:52 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> We don't; my conversations with the company lawyers seemed to
> indicate that you're implicitly assigning copyright simply by
> submitting code to an OSS project. Of course IANAL, but I'm going to
> trust what the ones we talked t
I never even considered just creating an instance after defining the class. Just too obvious I guess.Thanks Adrian! And thanks, Jay, for the feedback.On 7/4/06,
Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/4/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I think you may be overengineering a b
It was merged already, should I fix the wiki start page?
Multiple authentication backends: the multi-auth branch of Django,
currently under development, is abstracting the authentication backend
to make it easier to use other authentication systems like LDAP. Check
out the documentation to see ho
On 7/4/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you may be overengineering a bit. Django's views can be any
> callable object -- not just functions -- so you can pass callable
> classes to them. There's no need to use a custom middleware, and
> there's no need to use decorators.
N
On 7/3/06, Ryan Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been working on a bit of middleware that delegates view processing to a
> callable class instead of a function, and find myself going back and forth
> over an implementation detail.
I think you may be overengineering a bit. Django's views can
> They should be added, since we are bound to get some edge cases wrong
> (c.f. initial SQL parsing) and having regression tests will help there.
> If you could add those, that would be great. Testing both sorts of
> quotes, backslashes, semicolons and percentage signs would be my
> suggestion for
On 7/4/06, Ryan Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my issue: Is simply requiring that these method names be uppercase
> enough to distinguish them from non-http method handling methods? I've
> created an httpmethod decorator to help further distinguish these methods,
> but at times it fee
I was having a discussion today with a client who are using Django
templates inside their own code, without using the ORM or views.
It initially started out because they were using the old
os.environ['DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE'] = '__main__'
hack and had discovered that the timezone was be
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 23:33 -0700, jws wrote:
> > (1) It's been closed twice; once each by Jacob and Adrian. Closing it or
> > applying both make some sense to me, so I'm not about to go any further
> > without some clarification.
>
> The discussion regarding the closure and subsequent re-opening
15 matches
Mail list logo
