Re: the so-called [AUDIT]

2006-06-03 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 03-Jun-06, at 10:37 PM, Jorge Gajon wrote: > Unbelievable how can someone spend so much time and effort on trolling > like this. > > It makes you question if someone is paying him to do this, or if he > has a serious psychological condition that deserves its own branch of > study. > > Good th

Re: Patch review procedure?

2006-06-03 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
I'm arriving late to this thread; been travelling on business last week and only catching up on email in some downtime this weekend. The topic here is something I've been tossing around in my head a bit, too, since I'm not sure how best to help without making life harder for Adrian and Jacob. Anyw

NO 1 website for IT Jobs

2006-06-03 Thread Smith
Hello and Hi Today, I tell you another Best Website for finding the best job. Please check this link and enjoy your dream job.   http://www.it-jse.com   Special thing about this website is, they are presenting direct links to jobs. They are using only Direct Employers and not using Staffin

Re: the so-called [AUDIT]

2006-06-03 Thread Jorge Gajon
Unbelievable how can someone spend so much time and effort on trolling like this. It makes you question if someone is paying him to do this, or if he has a serious psychological condition that deserves its own branch of study. Good thing he got spotted sooner than later. On 6/2/06, Julian 'Ju

Re: proposal for a new ValidationError

2006-06-03 Thread Bill de hÓra
Gary Wilson wrote: > What do you think about adding a ValidationError similar to > CriticalValidationError but one that would stop further evaluation of > _all_ validators in the manipulator instead of just the remaining > validators for the current form field being processed? It's not an error,