On 5/10/06, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand that this is not a priority for Django, but I would like
> to know if anyone is working on Ajax support in Django. I read through
> the proposals and was wondering if I could do anything to help with one
> of the layers (preferably wit
hi, there.
please consider the following situation.
say, there are three different tables in your database structure;
'catalogue', 'book' and 'cataloguebook' (which maintains an n:m
relationship between 'catalogue' and 'book'), and if you set your
'lastmodified' field in 'cataloguebook' like the
could someone with more experience create a patch for MR based on this
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/87?
thanks,
peter
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to th
hi jason, yeah, that's fine but modules have been
renamed/merged/deleted since your patch, so it's very hard to find
where your code should go.
for example django/core/meta/__init__.py does not exist anymore and i
did not find where should i add your offset/limit hack and that's just
one example.
that makes sence
so the answer to my question is: it would NOT be wise ;)
thanks
On 5/9/06, James Crasta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be easy enough to support both strings and direct
> references to the views? The callable() function can check that
>
> The logic would be something
On 5/9/06, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that this is not a priority for Django, but I would like
> to know if anyone is working on Ajax support in Django. I read through
> the proposals and was wondering if I could do anything to help with one
> of the layers (preferably with t
I understand that this is not a priority for Django, but I would like
to know if anyone is working on Ajax support in Django. I read through
the proposals and was wondering if I could do anything to help with one
of the layers (preferably with the view, because I'm sure that needs
the most work).
Wouldn't it be easy enough to support both strings and direct
references to the views? The callable() function can check that
The logic would be something like this:
if callable(viewfunc):
viewfunc()
else:
# resolve function using the older means.
or you could just check if viewfunc wa
> Thanks for this ticket/patch! Yes, some documentation would be
> fantastic and would help me understand how to use this before
> committing it to trunk. Go ahead and write those docs and append 'em
> to the ticket, if you get a chance.
I wrote up some documentation in ReST style, copying the st
peter_k wrote:
> hi jason, i am willing to help but i am not a python expert (yet). that
> being said, if you'd explain how this backend works (especially the
> oracle-related tweaks) we could work on it together.
>
> thanks,
> peter
Peter, I posted some of my explanations to the Django dev lis
If this ticket could get some quick love I'd much appreciate it.
Something is definitely wrong, but is the patch acceptable?
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1767
I brought it up on the list last week, but no one seemed to have an
opinion, or it just got missed.
http://groups.google.com/grou
On 5/9/06, tekNico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, this is my first message here. I am a Python web developer
> since 1999, gone through Zope 1, Zope 2, some Zope 3, Quixote,
> Twisted, Nevow, and the Divmod stuff.
>
> One of the reasons I am here is the helpful, if not strenuous ;-P ,
> evangel
Hi
I must say I'm really annoyed that you cannot use models interactively,
or pychecker you model. To circumvent this restriction, I propose to add
a module level attribute for model modules, such as
app_label = "applabel"
... I've created a patch for this, see the ticket
http://code.djangopr
Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Now I'm not sure either, looking back at the posts :-)
>
> Some people (e.g. Joseph) were definitely thinking in terms of doing a
> UNION or UNION ALL in SQL. For 'UNION', I think the ORM constrains you
> to using a single model, and therefore a single table, in which c
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On May 8, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>> How do I test that the changes I've made to documentation (in the /
>> docs/
>> folder) are correct ReST, and will produce the HTML docs correctly,
>> before committing something or submitting a patch?
>
> The rst2html too
15 matches
Mail list logo