On 4/28/06, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started to track this down, found that while constructing the sql
> clause, None values are deliberately ignored.
>
> In db.models.query, function parse_lookup() walks through the kwargs and
> tests:
>
> for kwarg, value in kwarg_items
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> The worst is behind you. :)
Joy! *grin* I feel bad about not getting all the way through a clean
migration and wikiing the steps, but it's been a long couple of weeks
at work and at home! I'll dump some more stuff in today, though, after
I clean up some model stuff. The d
Great. I can't wait Adrian... Unfortunately I'm new to django so i
can't help with anything yet.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django
On 4/29/06, CoolGoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a stupid question... The tutorial01 from mr says A public site
> that lets people read your blog entries and submit and afther that you
> make a pool app. Maybe someone can make the tutorial about a blog from
> http://www.rossp.org/ to rm s
Hi Ivan.
I did something similar to this a while back (based on Hugo's work):
http://svn.zilbo.com/svn/django/magic-removal/common/utils/views/filter.py
you could expand on that if you would like.
regards
Ian
On 4/30/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently generic view "obje
Currently generic view "object_list" can't filter the list by some
parameter in an URL. In other words this doesn't work:
(r'articles/tags/(?P[a-z]+)/',
'django.views.generic.list_detail.object_list',
{'queryset': Article, 'slug_field': 'tags__slug'})
One solution is to use "obj
