Re: magic-removal merge status

2006-04-29 Thread CoolGoose
I have a stupid question... The tutorial01 from mr says A public site that lets people read your blog entries and submit and afther that you make a pool app. Maybe someone can make the tutorial about a blog from http://www.rossp.org/ to rm syntax and some extra tips ? Thanks. Alex Bucur. --~--~-

Re: magic-removal merge status

2006-04-29 Thread Sandro
Thanks for the update it was exactly what I was looking for. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsu

Re: magic-removal merge status

2006-04-29 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 4/29/06, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you going to tag the pre-merge revision of the trunk? Yes, that's the plan. And if I forget to do it right away, we can always tag retroactively. Subversion is cool. Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com --~--~

Re: magic-removal merge status

2006-04-29 Thread Matthew Flanagan
Are you going to tag the pre-merge revision of the trunk? On 4/30/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/28/06, Ken Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > WRT migrating my older app, though...ick. Do you expect more db-schema > > changes of this magnitude before 1.0? > > No, I do

Re: magic-removal merge status

2006-04-29 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 4/28/06, Ken Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WRT migrating my older app, though...ick. Do you expect more db-schema > changes of this magnitude before 1.0? No, I don't expect any more db schema changes of this magnitude. This branch is intended to be the last set of *big* backwards-incomp