Will django.parts.media get dropped in again soon? I would like it if
the ImageField fully works again.
Cheers,
Rudolph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this gr
Istvan Albert wrote:
>suppose one wants to return content created by two generators ... they
>could wrap it themselves into a single one but why not write it both to
>the response and let that iterate thru each,
>
>
What if they want three? :-). I should say that it's still looking
theoretical
> just can't imagine any practical application of this...
suppose one wants to return content created by two generators ... they
could wrap it themselves into a single one but why not write it both to
the response and let that iterate thru each,
if your code would support that it would end up be
Istvan Albert wrote:
>but it is not an arbitraty iterator one is writing to, it is the the
>HttpResponse, why couldn't it handle new content being added just
>because some content is present as an interator? once it exhausts the
>original iterator it could continue on (if new content was added af
but it is not an arbitraty iterator one is writing to, it is the the
HttpResponse, why couldn't it handle new content being added just
because some content is present as an interator? once it exhausts the
original iterator it could continue on (if new content was added after
it)
or why not let th
> If I understood docs correctly this is now possible in m-r branch.
Sounds interesting! Which part of the docs?
Wouldn't you need to specify the translated field in the i18n_for_foo
table as well? For example an Article object would need translations
for both the title and the content.
--~--~
