Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 3/27/06, binaryfeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's most frustrating about this thread is that no one has responded,
>> really. I mean, it'd be great to know if it was going to be a matter
>> of days, weeks, or months. Much as I search for it, this information
>>
hi gabor.
I am a newbie to django (and webdevelopment) and so I guess my opinion
is a resonable gauge for people learning django.
After 2 (small) projects with trunk I've just started another one with
MR. It's not only very usable, but great. Much clearer and very
straight foward to hack on. Afte
On 3/27/06, binaryfeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's most frustrating about this thread is that no one has responded,
> really. I mean, it'd be great to know if it was going to be a matter
> of days, weeks, or months. Much as I search for it, this information
> seems to be impossible to fi
On Monday 27 March 2006 15:22, binaryfeed wrote:
> gabor wrote:
> > is there a plan or a rough estimate about when the magic-removal
> > branch is going to be merged back to the trunk?
> >
> > this month?
> > next year?
>
> What's most frustrating about this thread is that no one has
> responded,
binaryfeed wrote:
>
> What's most frustrating about this thread is that no one has responded,
> really. I mean, it'd be great to know if it was going to be a matter
> of days, weeks, or months. Much as I search for it, this information
> seems to be impossible to find.
Nobody answered because
gabor wrote:
> is there a plan or a rough estimate about when the magic-removal branch
> is going to be merged back to the trunk?
>
> this month?
> next year?
What's most frustrating about this thread is that no one has responded,
really. I mean, it'd be great to know if it was going to be a mat
On 3/24/06, ChaosKCW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I have found a bug in the MR branch with verbose name.
> According the (out of date) documentation verbose_name_plural will use
> verbose_name + 's'.
>
> However when I just set verbose_name, Admin still shows the wrong name.
> If I set the
On 3/24/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's just for convenience though. Will anyone scream if I start
> adding generic view style arguments to the admin views in
> magic-removal?
Sure, go ahead and add a "context_processors" argument to the admin
views -- but hold off on ma
Hi,
If it's so stable since Pycon, why doesn't it get merged into trunk?
The trunk is not a release, but it's the first step towards a new
release. I'm just impatient :)
Rudolph
--
Release early, release often...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
> > I've thought about this a bit more; lots of good points have been
> > raised. What I'd like to do would be to add a new tag that takes
> > care of auto-escaping variables used within it. Something like::
> >
> > {% autoescape %}
> > Any {{ variables }} used within this {{ block }
On 3/27/06, John Szakmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to get up and running with the magic removal branch and ran into my
> first snafu. It turns out the sqlall command didn't quite work. Turns out
> it was an easy fix though (if the patch is correct). I've attached a patch
> for
Hello All,
I'm trying to get up and running with the magic removal branch and ran into my
first snafu. It turns out the sqlall command didn't quite work. Turns out
it was an easy fix though (if the patch is correct). I've attached a patch
for it to this email.
-John
--~--~-~--~---
12 matches
Mail list logo
