On 3/3/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1464
>
> I finished tutorial01.txt update, but didn't get to the others. Very
> sorry. If not completed when I get back in town (3/15) I'll pick up
> where I left off.
Thanks very much, Jeremy! I'm working
Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't currently have a system to test this
with), but you can already do this caching yourself (if you need it)
by:
>>> c = Camp.objects.all()[1]
>>> myleaders = c.leaders.all()
Further iterations of myleaders should use the cached queryset.
Obviously, this doesn't he
Oops sorry, I meant to include the ticket #:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/500
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers
This has been discussed earlier on the list, but a simple solution was
sitting there waiting to be implemented so I just put a patch together.
Does anyone see any problems with it?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
Hi all,
The current descriptor implementation is inefficient for related object
lookups. For example, using my 'Camp' model, which has a many-to-many
'leaders' relationship:
>>> c = Camp.objects.all()[1]
>>> len(connection.queries)
1
>>> c.leaders.all()
[Jason & Ruth Phillips]
>>> len(connect
On 3/16/06, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It's not clear to me that inline comments were outright rejected here.
> >Perhaps I missed some other discussion but to my biased eye the
> >general concensus was favourable.
>
> I remember several situations where Adrian and Jacob rejected an inlin
Hello and Hi
Today, I tell you another Best
Website for finding the best job.
Please check this link and enjoy
your dream job.
http://www33.websamba.com/freecareer/index.asp
Special thing about this website
is, they are presenting direct links to jobs.
They are using only Direct
Employe
>It's not clear to me that inline comments were outright rejected here.
>Perhaps I missed some other discussion but to my biased eye the
>general concensus was favourable.
I remember several situations where Adrian and Jacob rejected an inline
comment syntax (IRC, tickets, group). I found one dir
Hi,
I was wondering, with the new validation framework stuff, with
validators embedded into the models themselves, how do you use that
model with a form? Are there still AddManipulator and ChangeManipulator
available, just calling into validators in the models themselves?
Cheers,
Thomas
--~--~
