Ticket #463 (MySQL patch)

2006-02-20 Thread Eugene Lazutkin
I am using mysql_trunk_rev2360-1.diff by Greg on Python 2.4. So far it works as expected --- TLS is clearly the way to go. Did anybody try it with Python 2.3? Greg's last suggestion was to use _thread_local.py. Probably this is the best way to do it for 2.3. If it works on 2.3, let's start lo

Re: Model API: blank=True vs. null=True for non-string fields; redundancy

2006-02-20 Thread Tom Tobin
On 2/20/06, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > blank=True with implicit null=True isn't probably what users would > expect when applying it to charfields. And having a rule where > charfields have null=False in combination with blank=True and > non-charfields have null=True with blank=True is rath

Re: Model API: blank=True vs. null=True for non-string fields; redundancy

2006-02-20 Thread Luke Plant
On Sunday 19 February 2006 00:21, Tom Tobin wrote: > Hmm; while it would be good to support edge cases like that, I think > the default should make general-use cases easier. Maybe null=True > should automatically set blank=True for non-string fields, but still > allow one to then explicitly set

Re: Model API: blank=True vs. null=True for non-string fields; redundancy

2006-02-20 Thread hugo
>What are your thoughts on the modified proposal stated in my reply to >Luke (i.e., keep both, but have blank automatically set to True when >null=True and then allow the explicit setting of blank=False)? blank=True with implicit null=True isn't probably what users would expect when applying it t

Re: Model API: blank=True vs. null=True for non-string fields; redundancy

2006-02-20 Thread Tom Tobin
On 2/20/06, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >There currently seems to be a bit of redundancy with regards to the > >"blank" and "null" field options > > So I am -1 on the proposal to get rid of one of those two. Every > combination (even null=True and blank=False - think about legacy data) > ma

Re: Database migration practices?

2006-02-20 Thread Tim Keating
The way I typically do this is: 1. Rename the schema. 2. Update my model files. 3. Re-run django-admin install install myapp. 4. Write SQL statements to migrate the data from the renamed schema to the newly-regenerated schema. This sounds riskier than it is, but my experience has been that as lo

Re: Multiple form actions within one form

2006-02-20 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Feb 20, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Martin Ostrovsky wrote: > > > > > > I would want one python function to correspond to each of > submit_action1 and submit_action2. def my_view(request): if request.POST.has_key('submit_action1'): do_action_one(request) elif

Multiple form actions within one form

2006-02-20 Thread Martin Ostrovsky
How does django map multiple form actions within one form to python function calls ? For example, in the HTML below: I would want one python function to correspond to each of submit_action1 and submit_action2. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You recei

Re: 'Rotating' the fcgi backends.

2006-02-20 Thread hugo
>I want to exit() a backend after it has processed a certain number of >requests via FCGI (WSGI?). Any idea how to do it cleanly with Django? I think you would have to do that by patching FLUP. I don't think you can do it easily in Django. That's mostly because you don't have a way to specify co

Re: Model API: blank=True vs. null=True for non-string fields; redundancy

2006-02-20 Thread hugo
>There currently seems to be a bit of redundancy with regards to the >"blank" and "null" field options; tickets #1043 and #1353 seem to be >the inverse of one another, each addressing that one must specify both >blank=True and null=True to get the expected behavior (i.e., being >able to specify an

Re: using model classes without a server

2006-02-20 Thread Michael Twomey
On 20/02/06, John Szakmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing that I've found, at least on Django's trunk code, is that if you do > this, validation doesn't take place when you do model.save(). I tried > setting up a couple of fields as "required if other fields is present", and > it happil

Re: using model classes without a server

2006-02-20 Thread John Szakmeister
On Sunday 19 February 2006 13:36, Michael Twomey wrote: > On 19/02/06, xamdam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Django models can already be manipulated outside of the web app with > > manage.py shell > > I am looking for a way to have a regular python script (say, running a > > batch job) use the mo