Ken Kennedy wrote:
> Yep...I'm actually dealing with that today. It's instead only returning
> a list of datetimes that represent the months within that year that
> contain objects. (ie, if it's a blog, and you have posts in Oct-Dec of
> 2005, then the date_list would contain datetime objects for
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 20:59, ChaosKCW wrote:
> Hi
>
> I hope this is the correct place.
>
> I just took downloaded the magic removal branch, and entered some
> models in the new way.
>
> manage.py sql* functions dont seem to work.
>
> if i run the manage.py shell, and import manually it a
My solution was to prevent harmful tags and attributes in TinyMCE's
configuration. Even copy-pasting from word processors works ok now.
For more information see:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/msg/60ad1f2a544ec2d4
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received t
Hi
I hope this is the correct place.
I just took downloaded the magic removal branch, and entered some
models in the new way.
manage.py sql* functions dont seem to work.
if i run the manage.py shell, and import manually it appears to work,
but manage.py sql or sqlall or install, just error.
I
>>> archive_index is date_list
>>> archive_year is date_list
> But archive_year doesn't return a object list
Yep...I'm actually dealing with that today. It's instead only returning
a list of datetimes that represent the months within that year that
contain objects. (ie, if it's a blog, and you
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 05:17, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 2/14/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This change, at a glance, looks good. Go ahead and commit it.
>
> Ok. Will do.
After your commit, I updated my patch that removes '.all()' for related
objects, to take accoun
On 2/14/06, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But one thing I think about: wouldn't it be needed to have some
> overrideable function to handle the data from the custom template?
> Because the current code still expects the data in the same format as
> it would have with the default template - so
I just started using TinyMCE inside django's admin interface on one
site I'm working on. Simon is right... it's a bit sloppy and, from my
experience, really falters when pasting text. I've even had pages not
saving correctly after pasting text from another application. As long
as I stick with e
simplejson rocks. no objections here.
Nevow (http://www.nevow.com/) uses twisted.cred.
limodou wrote:
> I agree! But dojo seems too large? I also havenot played with it so far.
dojo is large but very modular. it can load stuff on demand if you make
it right, so there is not much blow there. what sense does it make to
use a toolkit that implements only a small subset for widgets th
On 2/15/06, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently I'm dealing with date_base generic view function. But I found
> that the object list returned are not the same name, for example:
>
> archive_index is date_list
> archive_year is date_list
I made a mistake that:
archive_index is lastest
Recently I'm dealing with date_base generic view function. But I found
that the object list returned are not the same name, for example:
archive_index is date_list
archive_year is date_list
archive_month is object_list
archive_day is object_list
why the names are not the same?
And sometimes I a
13 matches
Mail list logo
