doesn't Apache HTTP 2.0 run as a service on windows?
On 12/19/05, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was doing a bit of searching today to see what I could dig up to
> improve how the development server operates on Windows. I found this
> which is pretty close to what I want to do. It c
Hi all,
I have a few suggestions that I think could increase the the
capabilities and expressiveness of Django DB query syntax. The
modifications are aimed at increasing usage of Django DB syntax (in
preference to embedded raw SQL), and increasing the range of SQL
queries that can be expressed in
I added some really basic manipulator unit tests in the magic-removal
branch, but one of them fails due to a *very* strange error. Somehow,
the _() global translation function is getting reassigned to a
dictionary. See the test output below.
The same code (from the unit tests) works fine in the i
I was doing a bit of searching today to see what I could dig up to
improve how the development server operates on Windows. I found this
which is pretty close to what I want to do. It comes from Turbo Gears.
Is there any interest from anyone else to help me implement the light
development serv
>The problem is, I'm not sure what it would mean in the case where the
>object is "enlisted" in a unit of work. Basically, it would be a method
>with very odd semantics in the vast majority of cases ( ie running in a
>webserver in Django).
Agreed, that might be complicated to explain. So better j
hugo wrote:
>>This way, individual items would no longer need to have a .save method.
>>They would always be saved by the unit of work.
>
>
> I think I still would keep the object .save() method - just to make the
> simple case still as simple as the current code is - the programmer
> shouldn't
>So in the usual case, this would get done implicitly by some middleware,
>ie there would be a request scoped unit of work that would be used by
>managers unless told otherwise, and it would call save() if the request
>works, or it would discard it on an exception.
Yes, that sounds good to me.
>
On 12/18/05, Burhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My project is called : containers
> My app is called : admin
I suspect the problem is your app's name is "admin". Try renaming
that, and let us know whether the problem is fixed.
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | ch
HI. I was wondering if anyone has advice on setting up the small web
server to run in its own thread - something to see that it stays alive
as well.
Regards,
David
hugo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how about delegating _all_ DB-IO to the manager with magic removal?
> Currently all class-based selects are handled by the manager, while
> object-based selects and updates/inserts are handled by the objects
> themselves.
>
> How about internally delegating updates and obje
Hi,
how about delegating _all_ DB-IO to the manager with magic removal?
Currently all class-based selects are handled by the manager, while
object-based selects and updates/inserts are handled by the objects
themselves.
How about internally delegating updates and object-based selects to the
mana
Hello:
I ran into this strange problem with Django. I'm using the latest
development branch from SVN (because I have to edit the default regular
expression for the admin urls, which I was told in #django is only
available in the development release). I am running django with
mod_python and Ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
