Re: The road to 1.0

2005-08-02 Thread maney
I have no idea if this is practical, but from my own experience I suspect it will affect the interface and so it's a "now or not until version 2" issue. I would dearly love to see the limitation that primary keys (and, therefore, foreign keys) can be only single columns removed. It is, I know, s

Re: The road to 1.0

2005-08-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Aug 2, 2005, at 6:55 PM, Krzysztof Drozd wrote: #1 && #41 && #65should be a part of milestone 1.0 On Aug 2, 2005, at 6:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just think that #12 should be a part of milestone 1.0 I've added #1 and #65 to version 1.0. I'm not sure about #12 and #41; they bot

Re: The road to 1.0

2005-08-02 Thread Krzysztof Drozd
#1 && #41 && #65should be a part of milestone 1.0 Krzysztof Drozd

Re: The road to 1.0

2005-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Since we'd like to get started on our plan for world domination > quickly, please try to make any proposals for features of 1.0 by the > end of the week; I'd like to set a release schedule based on those > features early next week. I just think that #12 should be a part of milestone 1.0 Espen

Re: i18n -- let's do it!

2005-08-02 Thread Moof
Nebojša Đorđević - nesh wrote: > I agree, after a day of digging through the net and gettext > documentation I think that gettext way is the right way :). If and only if it's independent of locale. > And another question: > Should we go for "full" localization -> use locale python module

"django-admin.py inspectdb"

2005-08-02 Thread Adrian Holovaty
As of Django v. 384, I've added a new option to django-admin.py: "inspectdb". It introspects the tables in a given database and outputs a Django model to standard output. Sample usage: $ django-admin.py inspectdb mydb It's just alpha at this point; I just wanted to get something out the door. It

Re: i18n -- let's do it!

2005-08-02 Thread Nebojša Đorđević - nesh
On 2-08-2005, at 16:46, Ksenia Marasanova wrote: -1 It's my first i18n experience, but I think it's better to stick to an accepted standard here. I agree, after a day of digging through the net and gettext documentation I think that gettext way is the right way :). And another question:

Re: Django Wiki

2005-08-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Aug 2, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: Since it's a Trac wiki, it may not be a prime target for spammers (yet), but gardening would go easier if registration (or some other speed bump) was required. If it becomes a problem, I'll set that up (remind me to write a post about how I in

Re: Django Wiki

2005-08-02 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 8/2/05, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, this means we need some "gardeners" who help us keep the > spammers at bay; obviously anyone can do it, but if someone(s) wants > to volunteer to spend some energy keeping the wiki pretty and clean > I'd much appreciate it. Since it

Django Wiki

2005-08-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Howdy -- Since there's been so much great info coming on from the community, I've opened up the wiki at http://code.djangoproject.com/. I would *really* appreciate it if anyone who's written something interesting about Django would move it onto the wiki. Also, this means we need some "g

The road to 1.0

2005-08-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Howdy, all -- Django's been out as an unofficial pre-release for almost a month now, and it's about time to wrap things up to roll a 1.0 release. We've decided that Django, like Python itself, should put a very high priority on backwards compatibility, so now's the time to make any large

Re: i18n -- let's do it!

2005-08-02 Thread Moof
Ksenia Marasanova wrote: > 2005/8/1, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>Nebojša, or somebody else who's knowledgable, can you provide a basic >>checklist of all the things we need to do to get i18n up and running? >>I've seen your patches, but I'd appreciate a higher-level overview of >>all

Re: i18n -- let's do it!

2005-08-02 Thread Ksenia Marasanova
2005/8/1, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nebojša, or somebody else who's knowledgable, can you provide a basic > checklist of all the things we need to do to get i18n up and running? > I've seen your patches, but I'd appreciate a higher-level overview of > all the steps we need to take. T

Re: Question on django internals.

2005-08-02 Thread Matthew Marshall
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 04:20 am, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > On 8/1/05, Matthew Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm making headway with ticket 122. However I have discovered a bug when > > porting the m2m_intermediary model test. The get_relatedobject_list > > methods are not being set.

Re: i18n -- let's do it!

2005-08-02 Thread Nebojša Đorđević - nesh
OTOH, maybe we can go for database based solution like some PHP CMS I seen? This is, maybe, more user-friendlier way? Good thing is that users can change messages within admin interface, no need for external software on the server (for online editing of translations) and all apps can hav

Re: i18n -- let's do it!

2005-08-02 Thread Nebojša Đorđević
On 1-08-2005, at 20:12, Adrian Holovaty wrote: Nebojša, or somebody else who's knowledgable, can you provide a basic checklist of all the things we need to do to get i18n up and running? I've seen your patches, but I'd appreciate a higher-level overview of all the steps we need to take. Well,