Thanks for your quick response and fix!
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/mergecomposite-error-when-defining-custom-pattern/8505/5)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.t
Make sense. PR filed:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/6958
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/mergecomposite-error-when-defining-custom-pattern/8505/4)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails
Ooh, good catch, sorry for this. I mostly left that check in as a debug tool
for developing passes, but you're right, the partitioned graph won't match
anymore if we're doing more specific things, like matching on names, or
possibly matching on types. I think maybe we should just remove the ch
This is an interesting case and thanks for pointing out. I investigated it a
bit and identified that this is not the problem of MergeComposite but the
pattern partition. Specifically, you can reproduce this problem by replacing
`assert test_pattern.match(r) # True` with `assert test_pattern.pa
Hi,
I want to define a custom pattern, and then use the MergeComposite function,
but I met some problem.
The pattern I defined is a sequence of nested ops including reshape,add,...My
question is that why I got error when passing the is_var pattern to the
callback of is_op, but it is fine wi
