Awesome! Thanks and I believe it works.
[quote="mbrookhart, post:8, topic:9307"]
You were storing the add pre-mutation.
[/quote]
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/changing-return-of-relay-function-or-irmodule/9307/9)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabl
Ohh, I thought my bad! Thanks a lot. There is only a slight problem.
This is what I get. It adds an additional statement into relay IR ( %3 =
add(%x1, %y1);) and returns the result.
```
fn (%x1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32], %y1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32]) {
%0 = add(%x1, %y1);
%
Thanks, @mbrookhart. I think that is promising. However, now my "new_body"
becomes "None" which causes a (surely) error. This is caused by my version
over-written visit_call() function as follows:
I was hoping to save the "result" of add operator to self.return_values with
the following cod
Hi @mbrookhart
Could you please elaborate how I wrap multiple outputs for relay.Fuction?
This is my attempt to add an additional "return" to a relay function. In the
visit_function(), I tried to reconstruct the function, but the relay.Function
prototype does not have any place that I can wr
Hi All,
Is there a way to return intermediate values inside an IRModule as an output?
Here is an example. How can I return %1 or %0 as an output? from the IRModule
or form relay.Function? @mbrookhart any suggestions?
```
def @main(%x1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32], %y1: Tensor[(1, 1,
Hi All,
Is it possible to import relay IRModule from a text file?
Assume, I have a text file named "a.txt" which contains the following. Can I
import it to IRModule?
```
def @main(%x1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32], %y1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20),
float32]) {
%0 = add(%x1, %y1);
%1 = subt
Hi @mbrookhart, thanks.
I got it working by replacing the last line with
func = relay.Function(analysis.free_vars(new_body), new_body)
Not sure, why the one that I originally used not working. But this solves the
problem. Thanks.
[quote="mbrookhart, post:5, topic:9254"]
I think the issue is
Hi @mbrookhart,
I have made some attempts as you suggested (doing reverse topological order and
getting the part after IF as you suggested). Here is my understanding of your
suggestions which I also agree with. Please let me know if I got them wrong.
Here are the steps that I assumed that I s
Hi @comaniac , @masahi and @jroesch,
Any suggestions for the above problem? How can I extract the partitioned relay
function from relay IRModule?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/how-to-extract-a-relay-function-when-doing-partitioning-with-relay-pattern/9065/2)
to res
Hi All,
Hi @comaniac, I want to follow up with my above post. I removed the IF
statement, and now it works.
Is that mean there is some MergeCompilerRegions does not fully support IF yet.
This is the code that works.
```
# this is test case for graph type 1
print("Graph type 1")
[quote="comaniac, post:7, topic:8290"]
`MergeCompilerRegion`
[/quote]
Thank @comaniac.
I have tried to use MergeCompilerRegion, and it is giving me an error with the
following code. The following code works (I commented out MergeCompilerRegion),
and it produces output with UNMERGED @special_
Hi All,
Thanks @masahi, @comaniac and @matt-arm. It worked now. That being said, I'd
like to confirm 1) if I understand the functionality of PartitionGraph()
function in the relay, 2) I'd like to understand if ParitioGraph() can be used
for my specific use case.
Here is my understanding of
Hi All,
I am working on trying to understand TVM/Relay’s graph partitioning
functionalities. Specifically, I have created the following simple example, and
I am getting the error as follows.
I understand that PartitionGraph() function assumes the graph is annotated with
target with Annotat
13 matches
Mail list logo
