Re: udev rules files

2009-05-06 Thread Richard Hughes
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Does that also have a solution for the power button? (The other ACPI > even that g-p-m listens to through hal) The kernel pushes that up through INPUT now. Richard. ___ devkit-devel mailing list

Re: udev rules files

2009-05-06 Thread Ali Abdallah
Martin Pitt wrote: > Richard Hughes [2009-05-05 16:20 +0100]: > >> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 09:50 +0200, Ali Abdallah wrote: >> >>> It is a very good idea to have it in devkit power, i see no >>> applications require lid events other than power managers. >>> >> There's a lid-is-closed p

Re: udev rules files

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Richard Hughes [2009-05-05 16:20 +0100]: > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 09:50 +0200, Ali Abdallah wrote: > > It is a very good idea to have it in devkit power, i see no > > applications require lid events other than power managers. > > There's a lid-is-closed property exposed in git master. Does that al

Re: udev rules files

2009-05-05 Thread Ali Abdallah
Richard Hughes wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 09:50 +0200, Ali Abdallah wrote: > >> It is a very good idea to have it in devkit power, i see no >> applications require lid events other than power managers. >> > > There's a lid-is-closed property exposed in git master. > Awesome, Thanks

Re: udev rules files

2009-05-05 Thread Richard Hughes
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 09:50 +0200, Ali Abdallah wrote: > It is a very good idea to have it in devkit power, i see no > applications require lid events other than power managers. There's a lid-is-closed property exposed in git master. Richard. ___ devk

Re: udev rules files

2009-05-01 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 02:33, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:22:46PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> >> interface. At that point, the block stuff will be disabled in HAL. >> >> power/battery/UPS handling from HAL. At this point, the part of HAL >> will be disabled. > > Why do you w

Re: udev rules files

2009-05-01 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:22:46PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > interface. At that point, the block stuff will be disabled in HAL. > > power/battery/UPS handling from HAL. At this point, the part of HAL > will be disabled. Why do you want to disable stuff in hal? Just don't use it? There may be

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:43, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 16:22 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> DeviceKit-power will use libudev, and take over the all the >> power/battery/UPS handling from HAL. At this point, the part of HAL >> will be disabled. > > Sure agree. Good email. Great

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-27 Thread Ali Abdallah
Richard Hughes wrote: > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 16:22 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> DeviceKit-power will use libudev, and take over the all the >> power/battery/UPS handling from HAL. At this point, the part of HAL >> will be disabled. >> > > Sure agree. Good email. One question: > > Switche

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-27 Thread Richard Hughes
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 16:22 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > DeviceKit-power will use libudev, and take over the all the > power/battery/UPS handling from HAL. At this point, the part of HAL > will be disabled. Sure agree. Good email. One question: Switches (killswitch, lid, tablet, headphone) are not

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-26 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 23:45, Michael Biebl wrote: > Afaics, no such work has been done yet within hal, which allows to > disable the different components. Yeah, that will be done, when we consider the stuff to be ready. It will be pretty easy to that, I expect. > On the other hand, gnome-power

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Kay, thanks a lot for the informative reply 2009/4/26 Kay Sievers : > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:54, Michael Biebl wrote: >> 2009/4/6 Kay Sievers : >>> >>> But the base DeviceKit daemon, that is just an event multiplexer, may >>> go away and get replaced by udev itself. We will send an update

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-26 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:54, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2009/4/6 Kay Sievers : >> >> But the base DeviceKit daemon, that is just an event multiplexer, may >> go away and get replaced by udev itself. We will send an update on >> this the next weeks, when we do a final decision. > > Any updates on thi

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
2009/4/6 Kay Sievers : > > But the base DeviceKit daemon, that is just an event multiplexer, may > go away and get replaced by udev itself. We will send an update on > this the next weeks, when we do a final decision. Any updates on this? Would be nice what you guys are planning and in which direc

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-06 Thread David Zeuthen
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 20:48 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed, that all DeviceKit packages install their udev rules files > into /etc/udev/rules.d > > Isn't that deprecated by now (yet still supported) and one should use > /lib/udev/rules.d instead? Fixe

Re: udev rules files

2009-04-06 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:48, Michael Biebl wrote: > I noticed, that all DeviceKit packages install their udev rules files > into /etc/udev/rules.d > > Isn't that deprecated by now (yet still supported) and one should use > /lib/udev/rules.d instead? It should, yes. All syste

udev rules files

2009-04-06 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, I noticed, that all DeviceKit packages install their udev rules files into /etc/udev/rules.d Isn't that deprecated by now (yet still supported) and one should use /lib/udev/rules.d instead? Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the univers