Re: pm-utils dependency

2013-02-12 Thread Ifai Gios
2013/2/12 Richard Hughes > > I've pushed the following commits: Thanks for looking into this! I'm testing your patchset right now. ___ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-deve

Re: pm-utils dependency

2013-02-12 Thread Richard Hughes
On 12 February 2013 09:41, Richard Hughes wrote: > I'll have a go at this today in git master. I've pushed the following commits: commit 9843589d2d80e6dc2b3f51338e64bd1da1c53860 Author: Richard Hughes Date: Tue Feb 12 10:53:49 2013 + Require applications to define UPOWER_ENABLE_DEPRE

Re: pm-utils dependency

2013-02-12 Thread Richard Hughes
On 11 February 2013 23:13, Ifai Gios wrote: > If these changes are made, and pm-utils is dropped at least for > HAVE_SYSTEMD, then we could get rid of an useless dependency in our systems, > and simplify our stack a bit more. So, what do you say? I'll have a go at this today in git master. Richa

Re: pm-utils dependency

2013-02-11 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey, On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:13 +0200, Ifai Gios wrote: > If these changes are made, and pm-utils is dropped at least for > HAVE_SYSTEMD, then we could get rid of an useless dependency in our > systems, and simplify our stack a bit more. So, what do you say? Do you have a patch for that? Mind s

pm-utils dependency

2013-02-11 Thread Ifai Gios
pm-utils is unmaintained (last release was 2.5 years ago), buggy and has no real use in a systemd world, since suspend, hibernate and powersave are handled by the kernel, systemd and power managers. Despite that, modern upower still brings it in as a dependency, as it is used in the following place