On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 08:54 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Can you upload the new interface when we've got the changes
> in? Since it's public API and all, another round of review might be
> good.
New interface uploaded here:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/DeviceKit-power/gtk-doc/Latency.
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 08:54 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 12:08 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > Why wouldn't the admin just use the same method? I'm not sure why we
> > > need two separate methods. I mean, with a CancelLatencyRequest() and
> > > proper user interface the ad
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 12:08 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Why wouldn't the admin just use the same method? I'm not sure why we
> > need two separate methods. I mean, with a CancelLatencyRequest() and
> > proper user interface the admin can just remove requests that way.
>
> Nahh, the admin inte
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:26 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> If a cookie is what we want (and I think we do), we shouldn't implement
> it this way. Second, everything in a process share the D-Bus connection
> so this wouldn't be a very good cookie anyway.
Agreed, I've changed the interface.
> The po
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 13:34 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:26 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:47 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > I’ve put an interface file up here:
> > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/DeviceKit-power/gtk-doc/Latency.ht
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:26 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:47 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > I’ve put an interface file up here:
> > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/DeviceKit-power/gtk-doc/Latency.html
>
> Some comments
>
> 1. Regarding GetRequests() returning a
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:47 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I’ve put an interface file up here:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/DeviceKit-power/gtk-doc/Latency.html
Some comments
1. Regarding GetRequests() returning a(ussi), e.g. an array of
- pid, connection, type, value
why is t
Hi!
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:47 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Why don’t applications use the PMQoS interface directly?
In case someone is wondering: PMQoS is an acronym for 'Power Management
Quality of Services'. Mark Gross (the author of the corresponding
kernel patches) has some pretty slid
