On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 17:06 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:38 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Are you planning on shipping DeviceKit _and_ udev-extras in F11, or will
> > the latter obsolete the former?
>
> I think DeviceKit and what we're putting in udev-extras can live
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:19, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 17:06 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:38 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> > Are you planning on shipping DeviceKit _and_ udev-extras in F11, or will
>> > the latter obsolete the former?
>>
>> I think
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 17:06 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:38 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Are you planning on shipping DeviceKit _and_ udev-extras in F11, or will
> > the latter obsolete the former?
>
> I think DeviceKit and what we're putting in udev-extras can live s
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:38 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Are you planning on shipping DeviceKit _and_ udev-extras in F11, or will
> the latter obsolete the former?
I think DeviceKit and what we're putting in udev-extras can live side by
side just fine.
And we probably want a separate udev-dbus
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:05 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> NOTE NOTE NOTE: This is an unstable release of DeviceKit-disks, all
> API is subject to change.
Are you planning on shipping DeviceKit _and_ udev-extras in F11, or will
the latter obsolete the former?
Richard.
___
