Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-30 Thread Chris Frey
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:06:12AM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:21:37AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > But I don't see any of his handling in the new udev rules. > > > > Installed udev: > > /lib/udev/rules.d/70-acl.rules >

Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-30 Thread Chris Frey
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:21:37AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > But I don't see any of his handling in the new udev rules. > > Installed udev: > /lib/udev/rules.d/70-acl.rules > /lib/udev/udev-acl (helper program) > > Source tree: > extras/udev-acl/ Thank you! This is starting to make sens

Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-29 Thread Chris Frey
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:09:54AM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > Actually the way it's going to work in future distros (next Fedora, Suse > and Ubuntu releases at least) is that ACL handling is moved to udev - it > should make it a lot easier to configure. See the udev sources for > details on how

Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-29 Thread Chris Frey
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:09:54AM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > Actually the way it's going to work in future distros (next Fedora, Suse > and Ubuntu releases at least) is that ACL handling is moved to udev - it > should make it a lot easier to configure. See the udev sources for > details on how

Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-27 Thread Chris Frey
Hi, I'm the lead developer on the Barry project, and I'm currently working on getting Blackberry device permissions working on Fedora 11, with limited success. I just recently discovered that DeviceKit is the replacement to HAL, so I'd like to configure Fedora 11 the new way if possible. Some ba