Hey,
thanks for the quick response!
Bastien Nocera:
> [...]
> What UI differences would be needed to handle those different types of
> encryption? I'm guessing none for handling encrypted disks, because the
> UI should be pretty much the same as for the existing LVM based
> encryption support.
D
Hey,
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 17:19 +0100, segfault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support
> for
> unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails
> via
> udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs
> monitor). We i
segfault:
> Hi,
>
> we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for
> unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via
> udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs
> monitor). We internally track the status of this work in [1] and
Hi,
we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for
unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via
udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs
monitor). We internally track the status of this work in [1] and [2].
Currently we are
