On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:07:11 +0200
Ivan Lezhnjov Jr. wrote:
> Whatever it is, why does it think I need or want to limit access to the
> mounted device to just one specific user? Especially when you look around and
> realize that standard behavior has been to make the mount accessible by
> anyon
Whatever it is, why does it think I need or want to limit access to the mounted
device to just one specific user? Especially when you look around and realize
that standard behavior has been to make the mount accessible by anyone and
govern access to its contents by ownership and permissions info
> What does this strict ACL attempt to solve anyway? I'm not against it because
> I don't like ACL or whatever, but the problem here is that I cannot change
> easily enough this configuration.
> Traditionally, Linux/UNIX users/admins are accustomed to managing permissions
> with… permissions!
But it's not.
I'm talking a typical desktop computer running Linux and using USB drives that
are mounted automatically when they're connected to the computer.
This is as much of typical use case as it can be.
Other users should be able to read from those drives and not write only if the
files
