On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 11 February 2013 00:38, mark ellis wrote:
> > I've made a new patch that works just the same, but instead of copy and
> > pasting i've just moved the block that works out energy-full and
> > energy-full-design out of the coldplug if.
>
Am 12.02.2013 22:28, schrieb Michael Biebl:
2013/2/12 Ivan Lezhnjov Jr. :
Any tips? Recommendations? Known solutions?
For such special cases, I would just add the device to /etc/fstab.
If the device that is plugged is known in advance, this might work. We
had to deal with a large number of
2013/2/12 Ivan Lezhnjov Jr. :
> Any tips? Recommendations? Known solutions?
For such special cases, I would just add the device to /etc/fstab.
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
2013/2/12 Richard Hughes
>
> I've pushed the following commits:
Thanks for looking into this! I'm testing your patchset right now.
___
devkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-deve
On 11 February 2013 00:38, mark ellis wrote:
> I've made a new patch that works just the same, but instead of copy and
> pasting i've just moved the block that works out energy-full and
> energy-full-design out of the coldplug if.
So energy-full and energy-full-design actually change at runtime?!
On 12 February 2013 09:41, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'll have a go at this today in git master.
I've pushed the following commits:
commit 9843589d2d80e6dc2b3f51338e64bd1da1c53860
Author: Richard Hughes
Date: Tue Feb 12 10:53:49 2013 +
Require applications to define UPOWER_ENABLE_DEPRE
Hello,
I have a little problem that I'm trying to solve here.
I've got a bunch of USB drives that are automounted in GNOME with udisks2, the
entire experience is automatic at this point.
It seems udisks2 (or GNOME?) mounts a drive for a specific user by creating
/run/media/$username/$DRIVELABEL
On 11 February 2013 23:13, Ifai Gios wrote:
> If these changes are made, and pm-utils is dropped at least for
> HAVE_SYSTEMD, then we could get rid of an useless dependency in our systems,
> and simplify our stack a bit more. So, what do you say?
I'll have a go at this today in git master.
Richa
