Re: udisks and eSATA: a question about the meaning of "detachable"

2011-07-12 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/12/2011 05:45 PM, David Zeuthen wrote: > It's not necessarily something that happens a lot but it happens > frequently enough to warrant being careful. And while it's nice to > just hand-wave "oh, you should have turned off the automounter" or >

Re: udisks and eSATA: a question about the meaning of "detachable"

2011-07-12 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > I would think that a server admin in such a comparatively VERY rare setup > could be bothered to change the system policy to disable automount It's not necessarily something that happens a lot but it happens frequently enough to warrant

Re: udisks and eSATA: a question about the meaning of "detachable"

2011-07-12 Thread Phillip Susi
On 7/12/2011 3:57 PM, David Zeuthen wrote: As I've already explained GNOME does this for devices connected via USB/Firewire (99% of all flash readers) or for devices specifically tagged as being flash readers (covering flash readers connected via SDIO). So it's fine, GNOME is doing the right thin

Re: udisks and eSATA: a question about the meaning of "detachable"

2011-07-12 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 7/12/2011 11:47 AM, David Zeuthen wrote: >> >> Btw, this is how Nautilus and the GTK+ file chooser already work: if >> you click the volume icon and the device is not mounted, then we mount >> it (normally takes<  0.1s) and then you ge

Re: udisks and eSATA: a question about the meaning of "detachable"

2011-07-12 Thread Phillip Susi
On 7/12/2011 11:47 AM, David Zeuthen wrote: Btw, this is how Nautilus and the GTK+ file chooser already work: if you click the volume icon and the device is not mounted, then we mount it (normally takes< 0.1s) and then you get to see its contents. The only difference, really, is a) that you don'

Re: udisks and eSATA: a question about the meaning of "detachable"

2011-07-12 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:00 AM, David Zeuthen wrote: > I think the only workable solution is that the user interface simply > doesn't expose whether a device with mountable filesystem is actually > mounted or not - some sort of clever mount-on-demand thing. > Unfortunately POSIX doesn't rea

Re: udisks and eSATA: a question about the meaning of "detachable"

2011-07-12 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > And how are they supposed to determine that? By default nothing happens - as I said, the feature is mainly there for hobbyists. > At the end of the day, you either need to decide if you want to auto > mount new, unrecognized filesystems