Hey,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> However I think that 1st priority for udisks should be removal of all
> hardcoded stuff.
Before you write any patches please do ask (in the udisks bugzilla)
about whether such configurability is wanted. I mean, you seem to be
pretty m
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 12:43 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Your mail is indeed flamebait and I'm not sure it's really helping
> you.
To be honest I just want to bring this subject up.
Because program that hardcodes so much assumptions ought to cause lot of
trouble.
> If you want a
Hi Maxim,
Your mail is indeed flamebait and I'm not sure it's really helping
you. If you want a patch/enhancement into the udisks source tree, the
way to do this is to file a bug at bugs.freedesktop.org (as the udisks
documentation so eloquently states already):
BUGS
Please send bug re
Sorry for flamebait title, but I am really frustrated with udisks.
it, and libraries that support it have just too many hardcoded
assumptions.
Why it was done this way?
Isn't a point of rewrite to create something better?
My problem is that I want to make xD cards work out of box.
Not only devi
