Re: Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff?

2010-05-07 Thread Baybal Ni
On 7 May 2010 01:34, Baybal Ni wrote: > Yes, if it's security matter at least make it working without suid root > first, like use pam instead. This policykit is hardly a security framework. > > On 7 May 2010 01:26, "Richard Hughes" wrote: > > On 7 May 2010 09:02, Baybal Ni wrote: >> Why I can't

Fwd: Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff?

2010-05-07 Thread Baybal Ni
On 7 May 2010 05:36, David Zeuthen wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Baybal Ni wrote: >> Yes, if it's security matter at least make it working without suid root >> first, like use pam instead. This policykit is hardly a security framework. > > Can you elaborate on the last statement please

Re: Sleeping signal is only emitted if AboutToSleep is called

2010-05-07 Thread Richard Hughes
On 7 May 2010 20:48, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 May 2010 20:30, Tobias Arrskog wrote: >> I noticed a problem with them when implementing them into xbmc however. The >> resuming signal works fine but the sleeping signal is only emitted if I call >> AboutToSleep. > > That sounds like a bug. I'll

Re: Sleeping signal is only emitted if AboutToSleep is called

2010-05-07 Thread Richard Hughes
On 7 May 2010 20:30, Tobias Arrskog wrote: > I noticed a problem with them when implementing them into xbmc however. The > resuming signal works fine but the sleeping signal is only emitted if I call > AboutToSleep. That sounds like a bug. I'll fix that up now. Richard. _

Sleeping signal is only emitted if AboutToSleep is called

2010-05-07 Thread Tobias Arrskog
Hi! I'm one of the developer over at team-xbmc and I recently noticed that UPower have added the Sleeping and Resuming signals, awesome! I noticed a problem with them when implementing them into xbmc however. The resuming signal works fine but the sleeping signal is only emitted if I call AboutToS

Re: Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff?

2010-05-07 Thread David Zeuthen
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Baybal Ni wrote: > Yes, if it's security matter at least make it working without suid root > first, like use pam instead. This policykit is hardly a security framework. Can you elaborate on the last statement please? David

Re: Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff?

2010-05-07 Thread Baybal Ni
Yes, if it's security matter at least make it working without suid root first, like use pam instead. This policykit is hardly a security framework. On 7 May 2010 01:26, "Richard Hughes" wrote: On 7 May 2010 09:02, Baybal Ni wrote: > Why I can't compile upower without pol... Because UPower uses

Re: Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff?

2010-05-07 Thread Richard Hughes
On 7 May 2010 09:02, Baybal Ni wrote: > Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff? Because UPower uses PolicyKit as a security framework. Why do you want to change it? Richard. ___ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected]

Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff?

2010-05-07 Thread Baybal Ni
Why I can't compile upower without policykit and other *kit stuff? ___ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel