y
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, [email protected] wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Martin Pitt wrote:
[email protected] [2009-12-10 20:49 -0800]:
I don't mean to be disrespectful, but it doesn't surprise me that this
is considered OS neutral. However, the fact that "U" sits prominantly in
the na
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Martin Pitt wrote:
[email protected] [2009-12-10 20:49 -0800]:
I don't mean to be disrespectful, but it doesn't surprise me that this
is considered OS neutral. However, the fact that "U" sits prominantly in
the name implies that it is derived from 'udev': a Linux-on
[email protected] [2009-12-10 20:49 -0800]:
>I don't mean to be disrespectful, but it doesn't surprise me that this
> is considered OS neutral. However, the fact that "U" sits prominantly in
> the name implies that it is derived from 'udev': a Linux-only facility.
No, it means "Unix". Or
Jedy Wang [2009-12-11 12:00 +0800]:
> In talking with some people, they still think name like
> org.freedesktop.UDisks is a little project specific and might cause some
> misunderstandings.
It ought to be project specific; all D-Bus services are, precisely for
the reason that you can tell them apa
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 22:24 -0600, Victor Lowther wrote:
> PM-utils 1.3.0-rc1 is not available for testing. Notable changes from
> the pm-utils 1.2 series:
Fresh after -rc1, -rc2 is out. This includes several bugfixes forward
ported from the soon-to-be-released pm-utils-1.2.7, along with a new
-
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:09 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> udisks already uses org.freedesktop.UDisks, and I expect upower will
>> change similarly.
>
> Right - and I think udisks, it being the project name is pretty OS
> neutral so I don't see any probl
Hi David,
In talking with some people, they still think name like
org.freedesktop.UDisks is a little project specific and might cause some
misunderstandings. If someone wants to implement a different daemon but
still keep the interfaces compatible with upower/udisks, then name like
UDisks/UPower i
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:09 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> udisks already uses org.freedesktop.UDisks, and I expect upower will
> change similarly.
Right - and I think udisks, it being the project name is pretty OS
neutral so I don't see any problem in using it in public interfaces. I
also don't thin
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:15:40 +0100
Tobias Arrskog wrote:
> Not sure if this is the right place to ask so please ignore if its
> not.
>
> Are there any plans for supporting any standardised messages on
> resume from suspend / hibernate. I have provided a pm-util script
> that will send a DeviceKit
Hello Jedy,
Jedy Wang [2009-12-10 15:20 +0800]:
> Currently, DBus interfaces provided by devicekit-power/disks are under
> org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Power/Disks namespace now. I suggest after the
> renaming, these DBus interfaces can be provided under
> org.freedesktop.Power/Disks or something lik
10 matches
Mail list logo
