Re: per-user udev rules subset

2009-10-14 Thread Stef Bon
Sorry, litlle type mistakes: Stef Bon wrote: I wrote > after creating the directory in the "shadow" directory: > > mkdir -p $HOME/Workspace/Devices/USBstick > it should be: after creating the directory in the "shadow" directory: mkdir -p $HOME/.fuse/shadow/Devices/USBstick Futher I wrote:

Re: per-user udev rules subset

2009-10-14 Thread Stef Bon
[email protected] wrote: >> > DKD handle several mountpaths (char **), so does my code (comma separated) : > if one of specified path matches one the mountpath of the newly mounted device > (which I recall, can be mounted by automounter, user, root, udev, ...) > The the value of DeviceMounted is e

Re: [Patch] Check whether on battery manually after a delayed refresh(DeviceKit-Power)

2009-10-14 Thread Pramod Dematagoda
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 10:36 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > 2009/10/14 Pramod Dematagoda : > > There is a problem with DKP where the daemon would not be aware of being > > on battery or not during a delayed refresh since it would seem that the > > backend does not send the daemon a device changed si

Re: per-user udev rules subset

2009-10-14 Thread gibboris
Hello, On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:39:42AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote: > Hello Raph, > > I'm sorry to say, but your email is too technical (complicated) for me. > I'll go through your answer checking what you mean: I'm really sorry, I was to quick to write, and wrote as if you wanted to understand the

Re: [Patch] Check whether on battery manually after a delayed refresh(DeviceKit-Power)

2009-10-14 Thread Richard Hughes
2009/10/14 Pramod Dematagoda : > There is a problem with DKP where the daemon would not be aware of being > on battery or not during a delayed refresh since it would seem that the > backend does not send the daemon a device changed signal during such an > action. > > I have attached the patch that

Re: per-user udev rules subset

2009-10-14 Thread Stef Bon
Hello Raph, I'm sorry to say, but your email is too technical (complicated) for me. I'll go through your answer checking what you mean: [email protected] wrote: > Hi Stef, > From what I uinderstand, udev is to low-level. > Too low-level. For what?? > My 1st goal is to get all devices (known