On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 10:55 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I don't think we should hardcode icon names in .mpi files. It'll cry
> for trouble for different themes, KDE vs. GNOME, etc. Either
> gvfs/solid should figure them out from the available data themselves,
> or .mpi should only have "device clas
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:51, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/7/3 Richard Hughes :
>> How's that for a compromise?
>
> Ohh, forgot to add, I've reverted the stuff from DeviceKit-power and
> g-p-m as I wanted to make a release on Monday, and don't want to
> release code in one release that we remove/mo
Richard Hughes [2009-07-03 19:57 +0100]:
> I would be happy to maintain a tiny service called
> DeviceKit-backlight, and remove all the backlight stuff from
> DeviceKit-power if that's a compromise people are willing to accept.
>
> We can then remove only install DeviceKit-backlight on embedded
>
Christophe Fergeau [2009-07-03 20:08 +0200]:
> Depends :-/ See sony-k750i_mobile_phone.mpi :
> Product=K750i mobile phone
> Vendor=Sony Ericsson
>
> and sony-ericsson_k810i.mpi:
> Product=Sony Ericsson K810i
> Vendor=Sony Ericsson
>
> These names are not really helpful for multi-productid files,
2009/7/3 Richard Hughes :
> How's that for a compromise?
Ohh, forgot to add, I've reverted the stuff from DeviceKit-power and
g-p-m as I wanted to make a release on Monday, and don't want to
release code in one release that we remove/move in the very next.
I also didn't appreciate the aggressiven
