Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Chris, Chris Frey [2009-06-30 1:35 -0400]: > The HAL way of doing things, as I understand it, is to grant the current > console user rw access to USB devices. Not limited to USB devices, this also comprises e. g. ALSA devices. > This could be done by chowning the device to that user or ad

Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-29 Thread Chris Frey
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:09:54AM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > Actually the way it's going to work in future distros (next Fedora, Suse > and Ubuntu releases at least) is that ACL handling is moved to udev - it > should make it a lot easier to configure. See the udev sources for > details on how

Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-29 Thread Chris Frey
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:09:54AM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > Actually the way it's going to work in future distros (next Fedora, Suse > and Ubuntu releases at least) is that ACL handling is moved to udev - it > should make it a lot easier to configure. See the udev sources for > details on how

Re: Blackberry device permissions

2009-06-29 Thread David Zeuthen
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 04:29 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the lead developer on the Barry project, and I'm currently working > on getting Blackberry device permissions working on Fedora 11, with > limited success. Actually the way it's going to work in future distros (next Fedora, Suse a

Re: Enforcing policies

2009-06-29 Thread David Zeuthen
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 15:03 +, echo6 wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Perhaps this isn't the place to raise this so forgive me if it is the > wrong list. > > Whilst deploying Linux on a variety of platforms and distros I have > always found it frustrating to find a