On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 03:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2009/4/27 Kay Sievers :
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 23:45, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Would this be part of udev/udev-extras? Would udev become dependend on
> D-Bus?
> >>>
> >>> No. If things work out as planned, DeviceKit, the m
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 03:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> What's the idea for platforms like Solaris or FreeBSD (which don't have udev)?
The (D-Bus) interface of the subsystem daemons, that is DeviceKit-disks,
DeviceKit-power, is not in any way Linux specific. We will take patches
for other operat
2009/4/27 Kay Sievers :
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 23:45, Michael Biebl wrote:
Would this be part of udev/udev-extras? Would udev become dependend on
D-Bus?
>>>
>>> No. If things work out as planned, DeviceKit, the main daemon, will go
>>> away. Subsystem daemons will subscribe directly
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 23:45, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Afaics, no such work has been done yet within hal, which allows to
> disable the different components.
Yeah, that will be done, when we consider the stuff to be ready. It
will be pretty easy to that, I expect.
> On the other hand, gnome-power
Hi Kay,
thanks a lot for the informative reply
2009/4/26 Kay Sievers :
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:54, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> 2009/4/6 Kay Sievers :
>>>
>>> But the base DeviceKit daemon, that is just an event multiplexer, may
>>> go away and get replaced by udev itself. We will send an update
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:54, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2009/4/6 Kay Sievers :
>>
>> But the base DeviceKit daemon, that is just an event multiplexer, may
>> go away and get replaced by udev itself. We will send an update on
>> this the next weeks, when we do a final decision.
>
> Any updates on thi
