I was actually hoping to write a simple “app” that inspects the meta objects,
and generates code based on that, instead of going the shiboken way and trying
to parse the C++ Code myself (though I am looking into shiboken as well). I’m
also looking into misusing clang(d) to parse it :) In the bes
On Wednesday 27 November 2024 23:45:02 Pacific Standard Time Marcus Tillmanns
via Development wrote:
> I would like to script the creation and usage of all of the QWidget classes.
> What’s the likelihood of acceptance (of a merge request) if I were to add
> Q_INVOKABLE to the constructors and meth
> On 28 Nov 2024, at 16:02, Fabian Kosmale via Development
> wrote:
>
> Note however that using QMetaType has the limitation that it will only allow
> calling the default constructor. While all widgets should be default
> constructible, you might want to construct e.g.
> `QDialogButtonBox::QD
Note however that using QMetaType has the limitation that it will only
allow calling the default constructor. While all widgets should be
default constructible, you might want to construct e.g.
`QDialogButtonBox::QDialogButtonBox` with some specific button). Could
be worked around in the bindin
> On 28 Nov 2024, at 15:01, André Somers via Development
> wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
> On 28-11-2024 14:29, Marcus Tillmanns via Development wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>>> On 28. Nov 2024, at 13:15, Shawn Rutledge via Development
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Nov 28, 2024, at 09:08, Fabian Kosmale
Hi Marcus,
On 28-11-2024 14:29, Marcus Tillmanns via Development wrote:
Hi Shawn,
On 28. Nov 2024, at 13:15, Shawn Rutledge via Development
wrote:
On Nov 28, 2024, at 09:08, Fabian Kosmale via Development
wrote:
- Some are already (indirectly) exposed via Q_PROPERTY; should anyone decid
> On 28. Nov 2024, at 09:08, Fabian Kosmale via Development
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't speak for our Widget maintainers, but in the context of renewed
> interest in Qt Lite, I'd suggest to put this behind a feature flag, so that
> users who don't actually need scriptable widgets don't hav
Hi Shawn,
> On 28. Nov 2024, at 13:15, Shawn Rutledge via Development
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 28, 2024, at 09:08, Fabian Kosmale via Development
>> wrote:
>> - Some are already (indirectly) exposed via Q_PROPERTY; should anyone decide
>> to expose those Widgets to QML (or some other language
> On Nov 28, 2024, at 09:08, Fabian Kosmale via Development
> wrote:
> - Some are already (indirectly) exposed via Q_PROPERTY; should anyone decide
> to expose those Widgets to QML (or some other language binding working on the
> meta-object system), this would cause some friction because ther
Hi,
I can't speak for our Widget maintainers, but in the context of renewed
interest in Qt Lite, I'd suggest to put this behind a feature flag, so
that users who don't actually need scriptable widgets don't have to pay
the price in binary size.
As far as direct drawbacks are concerned, it's
10 matches
Mail list logo
