Re: [Development] Fwd: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 01:06:37 PDT Björn Strömberg wrote: > example on spectrum on the support on modules: [unmaintained, deprecated, > life-support, full-maintenance, feature-development] The .gitmodules file for qt5.git is that. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Princi

Re: [Development] Fwd: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-28 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
/+/246320 Yours, Tuukka From: Björn Strömberg Date: Thursday, March 28, 2024 at 10:06 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Qt Project Development , Qt3D-Dev Subject: Re: [Development] Fwd: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch Hello Tuukka, thanks for your answer. In my

Re: [Development] Fwd: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-28 Thread Björn Strömberg
Hello Tuukka, thanks for your answer. In my view, as long as the 'rules' for the module(s) is clearly defined, as in this case say if KDAB takes over the official maintainer role, while it still lives under the QtC infra roof, and we still get the modules dropped with the other sub-modules, then

Re: [Development] Fwd: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-27 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi Björn, In general, we want to provide longevity and still host many items that are long ago removed from the main product configuration (or never been part of it). That said, we also need to have a way to sometimes let go of items in the main product configuration. Platform support is perhap