Re: [Development] Architecture of Android/Java bindings for QML and QtQuick

2024-05-31 Thread Edward Welbourne via Development
Fabian Kosmale (31 May 2024 10:00) wrote (inter alia), > I think that should be part of the normal API review process that > triggers after FF. Two things: * the one after FF is an API *change* review * delaying until then just slows that process down. If there are open objections to the present

Re: [Development] Architecture of Android/Java bindings for QML and QtQuick

2024-05-31 Thread Fabian Kosmale via Development
Hi, I don't think it's necessary to still flag the Android integration as TP like it was in 6.7, we already iterated on the API to cover the initial use case, and I think that one is covered by now in a way that we don't expect to change. I think there is a discussion to be had about how we ca