ai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 4:45 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>
> On sexta-feira, 26 de outubro de 2012 13.29.29, Koehne Kai wrote:
On sexta-feira, 26 de outubro de 2012 13.29.29, Koehne Kai wrote:
> So, in summary linking statically against system libxcb-* does only work on
> Ubuntu 32 bit so far, which obviously doesn't cut it. We could try to
> import xcb into src/3rdparty, and compile from there , but it's unclear to
> me w
ect: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>
> On quinta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2012 09.00.40, Koehne Kai wrote:
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,38146
Actually the whole patch falls apart on Ubuntu 64 bit:
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6
On quinta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2012 09.00.40, Koehne Kai wrote:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,38146
>
> A couple of notes:
> - I'm trying to not only link libxcb-icccm statically, but all libxcb-*
> libs.
> - it still leaves a general libxcb.so dependency on Ubuntu 11.10 at
> le
5, 2012 11:33 AM
>> To: Thiago Macieira; development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>>
>> [..]
>> If system xlib is not xlib-xcb, it won't work properly if there are xlib
>> calls
>> anywhere.
>
October 25, 2012 11:33 AM
>> To: Thiago Macieira; development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>>
>> [..]
>> If system xlib is not xlib-xcb, it won't work properly if there are xlib
>> calls
>> anyw
ject.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>
> [..]
> If system xlib is not xlib-xcb, it won't work properly if there are xlib calls
> anywhere.
Interesting. So far I thought xlib and xcb are completely independent, but it
seems at least on Ubunt
22.10.2012, 18:58, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 16.16.57, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>> 22.10.2012, 15:53, "Koehne Kai" :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
>>> that it limits the portability of Qt binar
Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>
[ ...]
> There's another: "static" link the XCB libraries into the plugin.
>
> You need to have the libxcb-*.a files with -fPIC, that's all.
Hi,
I've come up with this patch so far:
https://coderevi
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 16.16.57, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 22.10.2012, 15:53, "Koehne Kai" :
> > Hi,
> >
> > In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
> > that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't
> > part of any LSB
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Goffart [mailto:oliv...@woboq.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 2:08 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Cc: Koehne Kai
> Subject: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>
> [...]
> If you already hav
Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>
> On 10/22/2012 01:53 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
> that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb i
> -Original Message-
> From: Giuseppe D'Angelo [mailto:dange...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 2:14 PM
> To: Koehne Kai
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm dependency in Qt 5/libxcb
>
> On 22 October 2012 13:5
22.10.2012, 15:53, "Koehne Kai" :
> Hi,
>
> In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
> that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part
> of any LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a
> somewhat portable Q
On 22 October 2012 13:53, Koehne Kai wrote:
> But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a somewhat portable
> Qt binary on Linux is libxcb-icccu: E.g. I can't run a Qt compiled on Ubuntu
> 11.10 on my OpenSUSE 12.1 because of this dependency
What's exactly the issue you're facin
On 10/22/2012 01:53 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
> that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part
> of any LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a
> somewhat port
On Monday 22 October 2012 11:53:32 Koehne Kai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
> that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't
> part of any LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have
> a some
22.10.2012, 15:53, "Koehne Kai" :
> Hi,
>
> In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
> that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part
> of any LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a
> somewhat portable Q
Hi,
In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is that
it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part of any
LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a somewhat
portable Qt binary on Linux is libxcb-icccu: E.g. I can't
19 matches
Mail list logo
