On 18 September 2014 07:32, Simon Sasburg wrote:
> > Well, most sites out there I know start a download automatically if you
> > click on a download button (which you probably did from qt.io/download
> to
> > get to the page you mentioned).
> Well the problem is from qt.io/download there is no ch
> Well, most sites out there I know start a download automatically if you
> click on a download button (which you probably did from qt.io/download to
> get to the page you mentioned).
Well the problem is from qt.io/download there is no choice/indication
of what is going to be downloaded.
And as far
On 18 September 2014 09:07, Knoll Lars wrote:
> The automatic download is a bit overdone currently, as it also downloads
> on back/forward navigations and doesn’t remember that the package has
> already been downloaded once. So we should consider whether that’s the
> best approach or whether an a
yyskuuta 2014 0:39
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] www.qt.io/download-open-source is broken
>>
>> On Wednesday 17 September 2014 20:25:22 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> > Adding to myself: But I agree that downloading to a phone doesn't make
>>
evelopment] www.qt.io/download-open-source is broken
>
> On Wednesday 17 September 2014 20:25:22 Knoll Lars wrote:
> > Adding to myself: But I agree that downloading to a phone doesn't make
> > too much sense, and we should probably detect that you look at the
> > site from
>> I know of crazy people that do just that willingly and compile on open
>> source linux phones...
>
> There was that story of Aaron Seigo compiling Plasma Mobile on an N900. Took
> about a week.
Which has the rare attribute of making scratchbox/Madde look
comparatively handsome
_
On Thursday 18 September 2014 10:13:47 Lorn Potter wrote:
> I know of crazy people that do just that willingly and compile on open
> source linux phones...
There was that story of Aaron Seigo compiling Plasma Mobile on an N900. Took
about a week.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel
On 18/09/14 06:25, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 17/09/14 22:17, "Knoll Lars" wrote:
>
> Adding to myself: But I agree that downloading to a phone doesn't make too
> much sense, and we should probably detect that you look at the site from a
> mobile device. That part sounds like a plain old bug.
I kno
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 20:25:22 Knoll Lars wrote:
> Adding to myself: But I agree that downloading to a phone doesn't make too
> much sense, and we should probably detect that you look at the site from a
> mobile device. That part sounds like a plain old bug.
ugh... I hate those detections
On 17/09/14 22:17, "Knoll Lars" wrote:
>On 17/09/14 21:55, "Mark Gaiser" wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Kuba Ober wrote:
>>> I’d like to personally scold whoever came up with the idea of starting
>>>the “default” download at www.qt.io/download-open-source. I, for one,
>>>never down
On 17/09/14 21:55, "Mark Gaiser" wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Kuba Ober wrote:
>> I’d like to personally scold whoever came up with the idea of starting
>>the “default” download at www.qt.io/download-open-source. I, for one,
>>never download the default installer since it was always
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Kuba Ober wrote:
> I’d like to personally scold whoever came up with the idea of starting the
> “default” download at www.qt.io/download-open-source. I, for one, never
> download the default installer since it was always subtly broken in one
> fashion or another
I’d like to personally scold whoever came up with the idea of starting the
“default” download at www.qt.io/download-open-source. I, for one, never
download the default installer since it was always subtly broken in one fashion
or another, I always build from source. So now, the genius responsibl
13 matches
Mail list logo
