Re: [Development] staging in qt dev branches temporarily disabled

2013-03-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 15.30.42, David Faure wrote: > > correct (though, if it really is a performance *fix*, you should > > consider 5.1/stable). > > Well, performance *improvements*. > > AFAIU these should go into dev, because of the higher risk of regressions. Depends on the change

Re: [Development] staging in qt dev branches temporarily disabled

2013-03-26 Thread David Faure
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 14:25:35 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:30:26PM +0100, David Faure wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 March 2013 15:53:38 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > the "lock" can be removed on friday evening, i think. at least i hope > > > all integrations are done an