On Friday, 10 October 2025 01:54:23 Pacific Daylight Time Christian Kandeler
via Development wrote:
> 1) Note that there is no built-in formatter, only an indenter.
> 2) Indenting via clang-format has been the default for a while and is
> recommended for modern C++ code bases. Are you sure you are
ago ; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Development] proposed clang-format improvements for lambda
functions
>> AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine: None
>> LambdaBodyIndentation: OuterScope
>>
>> rationale:
>> * single-line lambda functions are harmful, as one can
On 10/10/25 12:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 October 2025 21:57:57 Pacific Daylight Time Tim
Blechmann via Development wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the second. More importantly, though: does
Qt Creator have a setting for that? If so, what it is? If not, then
DOA.
when using t
> i'd like to propose the following improvements to the clang-format:
>
> AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine: None
I tried that for a few months (for the same reasons as yours).
Then I reverted.
In my experience, it makes the code harder to read more often than
necessary.
Now, when I want to clearl
i'd like to propose the following improvements to the clang-format:
AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine: None
LambdaBodyIndentation: OuterScope
rationale:
* single-line lambda functions are harmful, as one cannot set different
breakpoints for construction and invocation of the lambda function.
* ind
On Tuesday, 7 October 2025 17:45:37 Pacific Daylight Time Tim Blechmann via
Development wrote:
> AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine: None
> LambdaBodyIndentation: OuterScope
>
> rationale:
> * single-line lambda functions are harmful, as one cannot set different
> breakpoints for construction and inv
On Tuesday, 7 October 2025 21:57:57 Pacific Daylight Time Tim Blechmann via
Development wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand the second. More importantly, though: does Qt
> > Creator have a setting for that? If so, what it is? If not, then DOA.
>
> when using the "built in formatter" instead of t
AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine: None
LambdaBodyIndentation: OuterScope
rationale:
* single-line lambda functions are harmful, as one cannot set different
breakpoints for construction and invocation of the lambda function.
* indent lambda bodies at the outer scope, so that the indentation
reflects
>> I kind of like single-line lambdas, but I understand not doing them for
>> breakpoint purposes. Still, we may want them for simple parameters.
That's a
>> stylistic choice.
+ 1 who also likes single-line lambdas that are doing a simple job
(e.g., returning a constant value or further cal
