On Wednesday, 16 de November de 2011 15.45.11, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> >> I am not sure what you mean by invite-only. Could you please
> >> ellaborate on the precise meaning ?
> >
> > A member propose to invite a person, and modulo approval of the others
> > he/she can join.
>
> exactly, just lik
On 11/16/2011 03:30 PM, ext Alexis Menard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>> We are planning to transfer that list to something @qt-project.org.The
>>> plan is to make that list invite-only and the archives private.
>>
>> I am not sure what you mean by invite-only. C
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> We are planning to transfer that list to something @qt-project.org.The
>> plan is to make that list invite-only and the archives private.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by invite-only. Could you please
> ellaborate on the precise meaning ?
> We are planning to transfer that list to something @qt-project.org.The
> plan is to make that list invite-only and the archives private.
I am not sure what you mean by invite-only. Could you please
ellaborate on the precise meaning ?
In general, I think it would be nice to provide the opportuni
On 11/16/11 11:32 AM, "Peter Hartmann" wrote:
>On 11/15/2011 09:30 PM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> (...)
>> The reason why many other projects have private lists for security
>>issues
>> is to avoid making zero day exploits widely known. It would most likely
>>be
>> good to also be able to
On 11/15/2011 09:30 PM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> (...)
> The reason why many other projects have private lists for security issues
> is to avoid making zero day exploits widely known. It would most likely be
> good to also be able to discuss some of these issues in a more closed
> mailing
On 11/15/11 2:33 PM, "ext Richard Moore" wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Peter Hartmann
> wrote:
>> I would like to propose the introduction of a low-traffic security
>> mailing list for posting security patches for Qt.
>> Right now we always need to write a blog post entry with an atta
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Peter Hartmann
wrote:
> I would like to propose the introduction of a low-traffic security
> mailing list for posting security patches for Qt.
> Right now we always need to write a blog post entry with an attached
> diff (see for instance [1]), but since e.g. SSL
Hello,
I would like to propose the introduction of a low-traffic security
mailing list for posting security patches for Qt.
Right now we always need to write a blog post entry with an attached
diff (see for instance [1]), but since e.g. SSL certificates get
compromised a lot these days, this do
