On Friday 04 March 2016 14:36:05 Ulf Hermann wrote:
> > Yes, of course we can, but it requires more work to do, so it is better to
> > evaluate the size first :-)
>
> I can tell you right away that debug symbols are insanely large. Just create
> a debug build of Qt and notice that it's gigabytes
2016-03-04 14:36 GMT+01:00 Ulf Hermann :
> Yes, of course we can, but it requires more work to do, so it is better to
>> evaluate the size first :-)
>>
>
> I can tell you right away that debug symbols are insanely large. Just
> create a debug build of Qt and notice that it's gigabytes in size. Do
Yes, of course we can, but it requires more work to do, so it is better to
evaluate the size first :-)
I can tell you right away that debug symbols are insanely large. Just create a
debug build of Qt and notice that it's gigabytes in size. Don't try to fit that
into our current packages, plea
On Friday 04 of March 2016 13:22:05 Ulf Hermann wrote:
> > The option is being evaluated. The main problem is that it seems that the
> > installer size grows 2x with force-debug-info enabled, we need to confirm
> > that it is not the case.
>
> You can add the debug symbols as optional separate pac
The option is being evaluated. The main problem is that it seems that the
installer size grows 2x with force-debug-info enabled, we need to confirm that
it is not the case.
You can add the debug symbols as optional separate packages. People who need
them can install them then, and we don't need
On Wednesday 02 of March 2016 09:00:35 Gunnar Roth wrote:
> >On 2016-03-01, Milian Wolff wrote:
> >> b) Apparently there are never any debug symbols shipped for the release
> >> build fo Qt. Having debug symbols even for a release build is crucial
> >> for a good profiling experience. Could we may
>On 2016-03-01, Milian Wolff wrote:
>> b) Apparently there are never any debug symbols shipped for the release build
>> fo Qt. Having debug symbols even for a release build is crucial for a good
>> profiling experience. Could we maybe get release builds in the future with -
>> force-debug-info t
On 2016-03-01, Milian Wolff wrote:
> b) Apparently there are never any debug symbols shipped for the release build
> fo Qt. Having debug symbols even for a release build is crucial for a good
> profiling experience. Could we maybe get release builds in the future with -
> force-debug-info to imp
Hey all,
I'm seeing some issues with the status quo of debug symbols for official Qt
releases:
a) Qt 5.5 for msvc2013_64 does not ship any .pdb files for most of the core
libraries. Seems to be fixed for 5.6. But is there a way to get the pdb files
for 5.5 as well?
b) Apparently there are nev
