On Tuesday, 22 de November de 2011 08.53.47, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> I can't recall an example of non-shared copyable class with a private
> implementation in Qt, so that mean they are rares.
If it's copyable, it usually *can* be shared. Non-sharability would exist in
the case where there are con
On Tuesday 22 November 2011 11:52:44 David Laing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just reading this:
>http://herbsutter.com/gotw/_100/
> and got to wondering about the pimpl idiom in Qt with respect to
> forwards compatibility with C++11.
>
> Should there be some discussion of the relative merits o
Hi all,
I was just reading this:
http://herbsutter.com/gotw/_100/
and got to wondering about the pimpl idiom in Qt with respect to
forwards compatibility with C++11.
Should there be some discussion of the relative merits of using
QFooClass* QFooClassPrivate::q_ptr
to refer to public classe
