Re: [Development] atomic commits across submodules

2017-12-18 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:22:31AM -0500, Adam Treat wrote: > 3) Private API being changed out from under > 3a) yet unreleased public api being revised. there is just no reasonable way to claim that the pain inflicted by the 5-stage workaround is a good thing. it's a barely acceptable thing given

Re: [Development] atomic commits across submodules

2017-12-18 Thread Adam Treat
On 12/18/2017 05:24 AM, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: On czwartek, 7 grudnia 2017 12:17:16 CET Adam Treat wrote: Hi, I think it is high time that we fix the underlying problem: supporting atomic commits across submodules. As I'm not against the idea, I'm not really fan of it either. The problem wit

Re: [Development] atomic commits across submodules (was: Suggestion to add labels when changing API)

2017-12-18 Thread Jędrzej Nowacki
On czwartek, 7 grudnia 2017 12:17:16 CET Adam Treat wrote: > Hi, > > I think it is high time that we fix the underlying problem: supporting > atomic commits across submodules. As I'm not against the idea, I'm not really fan of it either. The problem with atomic commits across submodules is that t